Sunday, March 23, 2025

Of course, Edna, a question arises spontaneously at this point. How come they waste time searching for goddesses all around the universe, when they have one right under their noses?

Artwork © Pshunya

Divinely Enough

Only a God can save us

Giorgio Agamben, Quodlibet, March 21, 2025

Heidegger’s abrupt assertion in his 1976 interview with Der Spiegel: “Only a God can save us” has always aroused perplexity. To understand it, one must first to return it to its context. Heidegger has just spoken of the planetary dominion of technology which nothing seems capable of governing. Philosophy and other spiritual powers — poetry, religion, arts, politcs — have lost the ability to shake, or at least to orient, the life of the peoples of the West. Hence the bitter diagnosis that they “are unable to effect any immediate change in the current state of the world” and the inevitable consequence according to which “only a God can save us”. That what is at issue here is anything but a millenarian prophecy is confirmed immediately afterwards by the clarification that we must prepare ourselves not only “for the appearance of a God”, but also, and rather, “for the absence of a God in [our] decline, insofar as in view of the absent god we are in a state of decline”.
It goes without saying that up to now, Heidegger’s diagnosis has lost none of its topicality; indeed, if possible, it is even more irrefutable and true. Humanity has renounced the decisive rank of spiritual problems and has created a special sphere in which to confine them: culture. Art, poetry, philosophy and other spiritual powers, when they are not simply extinguished and exhausted, are confined to museums and cultural institutions of any kind, where they survive as more or less interesting leisures and distractions from the boredom of existence (and often no less boring).
How then should we get on with the philosopher’s bitter diagnosis? In what sense “only a God can save us”? For almost two centuries — since Hegel and Nietzsche declared its death, the West has lost its god. But what we have lost is only a god to whom it is possible to give a name and an identity. The death of God is, in truth, the loss of the divine names (“holy names are lacking”, Hölderlin lamented). Beyond the names, the most important thing remains: the divine. As long as we are able to sense a flower, a face, a bird, a gesture or a thread of grass as divine, we can do without a God that can be named. The divine is enough for us; we care more for the adjective than the noun. Not “a God” — rather: “only divine can save us”.

(Emglish translation by I, Robot)

Make love, not war

And thus, Edna, to each opera its own phantom

Saturday, March 22, 2025

Sino-Indian Rivalry

朱锦尔 (Zhū Jǐn’ěr) – Divya Deshmukh
FIDE Women’s Grand Prix 2024–25; 4th stage; Nicosia, March 22, 2025
French Defence C11

1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. f4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. Be3 Be7 8. Qd2 a6 9. a3 0-0 10. dxc5 Nxc5 11. Bd3 f5 12. exf6 Nxd3+ 13. Qxd3 Bxf6 14. 0-0-0 b5 15. Ne2 Bd7 16. Bc5 $1 Rf7 17. h4 Qc7 18. Ng5 Bxg5 19. hxg5 g6 20. Be3 b4 21. a4 b3 22. Qxb3 Na5 23. Qb6 Bxa4 24. Nc3 Nc4 25. Qxc7 Rxc7 26. Bd4 Bc6 27. Rde1 Re8 28. b3 Na3 29. Be5 Rb7 30. Nd1 d4 31. Nf2 Bxg2


Black has gained a Pawn, but at the cost of conceding her opponent a dangerous initiative.
32. Ng4! Bxh1 33. Nf6+ Kf7? The losing move; she ought to play 33. ... Kf8! 34. Rxh1 Ree7 35. Bd6 Nb5! with better chances of defence.
34. Rxh1 h5 35. gxh6! Rc8 36. h7 Rxc2+ 37. Kd1 1–0. There could still follow 37. ... Rxb3 38. h8=N+! Ke7 (38. ... Kf8 39. Bd6+ Kg7 40. Rh7+ Kxf6 41. Rf7#) 39. Rh7+ Kf8 40. Nf7+ Kc8 41. Nd6+ Kb8 42. Nb5+ and mate will come in a few more moves.

Monday, March 17, 2025

No, Edna, no one can really know what anyone else is reading and thinking within one’s own four walls

Uncle Vanya Goes East

丁立人 (Dīng Lìrén), the only one World Chess Champion from China, appeared as a guest of honour at the T-Bank’s seminar “One Move Ahead” in Moscow, Russia, on Monday, March 17, 2025, in which he advocated the importance of chess as a means to develop strategic thinking and problem-solving skills.
In the free time, 丁立人 (Dīng Lìrén) gave a long interview to Sport24, in which, once again, he vindicated his affection for Moscow, “where I’ve been so many times that I can’t recollect”.
The interview conveys a portrait of 丁立人 (Dīng Lìrén) as cultured and sensitive, questing for meanings and spiritual growth while wandering in and around the Moscow Metro stations of the Soviet era. With a thought for Boris Vasilievich Spassky, the king who did not want to become king and who was rejected as king by Caïssa. “His death deeply upset me”, said 丁立人 (Dīng Lìrén). “The more I read of him, the more I recognise myself in him”.
Finally, he is an avid reader of literature, not only Chinese, but Russian as well. “I really like Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya — a masterpiece”.

Blue Bleu