Showing posts with label Gerolamo Tassinari. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gerolamo Tassinari. Show all posts

Thursday, October 30, 2014

La Caféothèque

Gerolamo Tassinari – Jules Arnous de Rivière
Paris, September 3, 1853
Italian Game C53

1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Bc5 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. c3 Nf6 5. 0-0 d6 6. d4 exd4 7. cxd4 Bb6 8. Nc3 0-0 9. h3 Ne7. Much better is 9. ... Nxe4 10. Nxe4 d5 as in the game Charousek – Exner, Budapest 1896. 10. Bg5 c6 11. e5 Ne8 12. d5 dxe5 13. Nxe5 Nd6 14. dxc6 Nxc4 15. Nxc4. A modern approach: the position is more important than the Pawns! 15. ... Qxd1 16. Raxd1 Nxc6 17. Nxb6 axb6 18. a3 Be6 19. Be3 Bc4 (19. ... Ne5 20. Nd5 Bxd5 21. Rxd5 Nc4 22. Rb5) 20. Rfe1 b5 21. Ne4 Bb3 22. Rd7 Na5 (22. ... Ne5 23. Re7) 23. Nd6 Bd5 24. Bc5 (24. Nxb5?? Bc6) 24. ... Rfb8 25. Bb6 Nc4 (25. Nxb5?? Bc6) 26. Nxc4 Bxc4 27. Ree7. Two Rooks on the seventh rank.


27. ... Ra6 28. Rxb7 Kf8 (28. ... Rxb6?? 29. Rxb6) 29. Bc5 Rxb7 30. Re6+ 1 : 0. For if 30. ... Re7 then 31. Rxa6 or 31. Rxe7.

A scholar and a gentleman

Albert Clerc – Gerolamo Tassinari
Paris, 1856
French Defence C01

In our last number we announced that a Tournament had been played in Paris, M. Clerc gaining the first prize, Signor Tassinari the second. We now reprint from our contemporary La Régence the deciding game of this spirited contest. Twenty-four players took part in it, the twenty-two behind the winners being M. Martin (third), MM. Acloque, Arnous de Rivière, Bornemann, Budzinski, Cerf, Coullier de Bechenec, Desjardins, Fritz, Hébert, Lafitte, Lanöe, E. Lefranc, Lequesne, Lesseure, Lustro-Lévi, Mercier, Montigny, Pasquier, Pick, and Preti.

1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. Bd3 Bd6 5. Nf3 Nf6 6. 0-0 0-0 7. Bg5 Nc6 8. Nc3 Be6. Ed. Note: More natural looks 8. ... Bg4 as in the game Solovtsov – Alapin, Saint Petersburg 1879. 9. Nb5 Be7 10. Ne5 a6 11. Nxc6 bxc6 12. Nc3 Qd6 13. f4 Ng4 14. Bxe7 Qxe7 15. Qc1. It seems that White could not have advanced his Pawn to f5 without danger. 15. f5 Qh4 16. h3 Ne3 17. Qe1 Qxe1 (This appears better than 17. ... Qxd4) 18. Raxe1 (If 18. Rfxe1 Nxf5) 18. ... Nxf1 19. fxe6 Ng3 and will escape, having won the Exchange. 15. ... f5 16. h3 Nf6 17. a3 Ne4 18. Qe3 c5 19. Bxe4 cxd4


20. Nxd5. A good move both in conception and in execution. 20. ... Qc5 21. b4 Qd6 22. Qxd4 fxe4 23. c4 Rad8 24. Rad1 c6. It would have been better to have preserved “the Exchange”, and not to have recovered the Pawn. 25. Nf6+ Rxf6 26. Qxd6 Rxd6 27. Rxd6 Bxc4 28. Rxf6 gxf6 29. Rc1 Bd5 30. Kf2 Kf7 31. Ke3 f5 32. g4. And wins. 1 : 0. (Notes by The Chess Player’s Chronicle, Vol. iv, 1856, pages 129-130).

The Chess Player’s Chronicle, Vol. iv, 1856, page 189.

Chess Monthly, Volume 1, 1880, page 102.

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Signor Bonaventura


Notes by Johann Jacob Löwenthal


Johann Jacob Löwenthal – Gerolamo Tassinari
London
Sicilian Defence B20

Game played at the St. George’s Chess Club, London, between Signor Tassinari and Herr Löwenthal, Secretary to the Club.

1. e4 c5 2. Bc4. Some player prefer 2. d4, because White thereby liberates his pieces quickly; but we are of opinion that 2. Bc4 is an equally good opening; since, if well followed up, it becomes very attacking. See the games in the Tournament of 1851, as played by Anderssen, who certainly conducted this opening with great ingenuity. 2. ... e6 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. d3 Nf6. 4. ... Nge7 is the correct play. 5. Bg5 Be7 6. Nge2 0-0 7. f4 Na5. Considerable time is lost by this move. White has nothing to fear should Black capture the King’s Bishop, and thus double the Pawn. Experience has proved that White’s game is thereby much strenghtened, since it keeps back the Black’s Queen Pawn, which eventually becomes the aim of White’s attack. 8. Bxf6 Bxf6 9. e5 Bh4+ 10. Ng3 d5. Black very wisely declined to capture the Knight, as he would have liberated the adverse King’s Rook, which he must eventually have found disadvantageous. 11. exd6 Qxd6 12. Qg4 Bf6 13. Nce4 Qe7 14. 0-0-0 Nxc4 15. dxc4 Bd4 16. Qf3 Bd7. We should have preferred 16. ... f5. 17. c3 Bf6


18. Nh5. An ingenious variation arises from taking the Queen’s Bishop. Suppose, 18. Rxd7 Qxd7 19. Nh5 Bd8 [Or 19. ... Bh4 20. g3 f5 21. Nxc5 Qe7 (best) 22. Qe3 followed by Qe3xe6+ with a good game, having a Knight and two Pawns for the Rook. 19. ... Be7 (If 19. ... Qe7 Black loses the game immediately, as White moves 20. Qg4) 19. Qg4 and wins] 20. Rd1 Qc7 [Black’s only reply (:) 20. ... Qe7 21. Nef6+ Kh8 22. Rd7 gxf6 23. Rxe7 Bxe7 24. Qxb7 and we prefer White’s game] 21. Rxd8 Raxd8 22. Nef6+ Kh8 (It is clear that by capturing the Knight he is mated in two moves) 23. Qg4 g6 24. Qg5 Qd6 and wins. 18. ... Bc6 19. Nexf6+ Kh8 20. Qg3 g6 21. Qg5, and Black resigns. 1 : 0. (Johann Jacob Löwenthal, “The Chess Player’s Annual for the year 1856”, London, 1856, pages 28-29).

Monday, October 27, 2014

Quelli che non benpensano


Notes by Johann Jacob Löwenthal


Marchese Gondi – Gerolamo Tassinari
Florence, a day in the life
Queen’s Gambit Accepted D20

1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4. Heydebrandt and other authorities consider it better to decline the gambit by playing 2. ... e6. We believe that the gambit may be accepted with safety. The style of the player, however, must in a great measure guide him as to the course he should adopt. If he has a predilection for close games, he will do well to decline the gambit, but if he prefers an open or attacking he may accept it boldly. 3. Nc3. 3. e3 is generally recommended. 3. ... Nf6 4. e4. 4. e3 is given in the Handbook. 4. ... e6 5. Bxc4 c6 6. Nge2 Be7 7. 0-0 b5 8. Bd3 Bb7 9. a3 Nbd7 10. Be3 0-0 11. f4 Ng4 12. Rf3 a6 13. Rc1 c5. A good move, as the sequel shows. 14. d5. Taking Pawn with Pawn would have been bad, Black wou’d have replied with 14. ... Nxe3, following it up with ... Be7xc5, winning, at least, the Exchange. 14. ... c4 15. Bb1 Nxe3 16. Rxe3 Bc5 17. Nd4 Qb6 18. Nce2 exd5 19. e5 f6 20. e6 Rae8 21. Kh1. Necessary, as Black threatened to capture the advanced Pawn. 21. ... Nb8 22. Rh3 f5 23. b4. 23. Bxf5 would have been preferable. 23. ... cxb3 24. Nxb3 Bxa3 25. Ned4. A useless sacrifice, which turns the tables in favour of Black. White should have played 25. Rcc3, maintaining the attack. 25. ... Bxc1 26. Qh5 h6 27. Bxf5


27. ... Nd7. Black conducts the attack with great ability. 28. Qg6 Nf6 29. Rxh6 Bxf4 30. Rh7 Re7 31. Bc2 Ne4. After this White’s game was past redemption. 32. Bxe4 dxe4 33. Nf5 Rxf5 34. Qxf5 Qf2 0 : 1. And White surrenders. (Johann Jacob Löwenthal, The Chess Player’s Magazine, 1865, pages 88-89).

As The British Chess Magazine says in its January 1948 issue, at page 16, the Marchese Gondi was the maternal grandfather of Stefano Rosselli del Turco.

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Tête à Tête


Notes by Howard Staunton


CHESS IN BELGIUM

The following game was played in Belgium a short time ago between M. de Rives, one of the best of the present school of French Chess, and Signor Tassinari, an Italian player of a considerable degree of skill.

Gerolamo Tassinari – de Rives
Brussels, 1853
Spanish C62

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 d6 4. d4 exd4 5. Qxd4 Bd7 6. Bxc6 Bxc6 7. Bg5 f6 8. Bh4 Ne7. We may observe that this variation in the attack and defence of the Knight’s game of Ruy Lopez has the tendency to produce the same position as that which has arisen in games played at the defence of Philidor to the Knight’s Opening. In one of these the moves have run:– 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 exd4 4. Qxd4 Nc6 5. Bb5 Bd7 6. Bxc6 Bxc6 7. Bg5 f6 8. Bh4 Ne7 &c. The position is the same as that in the game before us. Ed. Note: Another try is 8. ... Nh6 9. Nc3 Qd7 10. 0-0 Be7 11. Rad1 0-0 12. Qc4+ Rf7 13. Nd4 Ng4 14. h3 Ne5 15. Qe2 with an edge, P. C. Morphy – Harrwitz, Paris 1858, match game 4. 9. Nc3 Ng6 10. Bg3 Be7 11. Nd5. Castling on the King’s side is perhaps preferable. 11. ... 0-0 12. Nh4. In these cramped games, the first player should avoid impairing his position by the exchange of pieces. Had he castled at his previous move, he would, unless we are mistaken, have preserved his advantage with underring certainty. 12. ... Nxh4 13. Bxh4 Kh8 14. 0-0-0 Bxd5 15. Qxd5 c6 16. Qe6 Re8 17. f4 Bf8 18. Qf5 Qb6. Obviously threatening to check at e3. 19. Rhe1 Rad8 20. e5. This looks somewhat premature. Ed. Note: Worth considering was 20. g4 intending both g4-g5 and Rd1-d3-h3. 20. ... Qa5. The danger of a castled position on the Queen’s side is well shown here. This move gains time at a most important crisis. 21. Kb1 dxe5 22. Bg3. We imagine 22. Rxd8 to be a better move, and one likely to produce a drawn game. A leading variation arising therefrom is:– 22. Rxd8 Rxd8 23. fxe5 Bb4 24. c3 Bxc3 25. bxc3 Qxc3 and Black, we believe, will at least draw the game. Ed. Note: Staunton raves: 22. Rxd8 Rxd8 23. fxe5?? is simply refuted by 23. ... Qxe1+! 24. Bxe1 Rd1 mate. 22. ... Bb4 23. c3 Rxd1+ 24. Rxd1 exf4 25. Qd7. To exchange Queens, and then take the Pawn with his Bishop, would be simpler and better. 25. Qxf4 would also be much sounder. 25. ... Qh5 26. cxb4. 26. Bxf4 seems to be more free from objection. 26. ... fxg3 27. hxg3 h6 28. g4 Qg6+ 29. Ka1 Re2 30. Qxb7. After this move White’s game is indefensible.


30. ... Qc2 31. Qc8+. Ed. Note: Useless, but also after 31. Rb1 Rxg2 White is doomed. 31. ... Kh7 32. Qf5+ Qxf5 33. gxf5 Rxg2 34. Rf1 h5 35. a3 Kh6 36. Ka2 h4 37. a4 h3 38. b5 cxb5 39. axb5 h2 40. Rh1 Kg5 41. Kb3 Kxf5 42. Kc3 g5 43. b4 g4. And White surrendered. 0 : 1. (Notes by Howard Staunton, The Chess Player’s Chronicle, Vol. iii, 1855, pages 14-15).

History of Civilization in England

Gerolamo Tassinari – Henry Thomas Buckle
London, 1855
French Defence C01

Nous devons à l’obligeance de S. Tassinari la partie suivante, qu’il a jouée au “Cigar Divan” contre M. Buckle, un des plus forts joueurs d’Angleterre. 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. Bd3 Bd6 6. 0-0 0-0 7. h3 Nc6 8. c4 dxc4 9. Bxc4 Bf5 10. Bg5 h6 11. Bh4 g5 12. Bg3 Bxg3 13. fxg3 Ne4 14. d5 Na5 15. Ne5 Nxg3 16. Rf3 Qd6 17. Qe1 Rae8. Ed. Note: “From this point Black, with a Pawn ahead, must win”, remarked Johann Jacob Löwenthal – see The Chess Player’s Magazine, Vol. ii, 1864, page 43. 18. Qxa5 Qxe5 19. Qc3 Ne4 20. Qxe5 Rxe5 21. Na3 Nd6 22. Bb3 Rfe8 23. Rc1 Re1+ 24. Rxe1 Rxe1+ 25. Kf2 Re5 26. Re3 Rxe3 27. Kxe3 Kf8 28. Nc4 Nxc4+ 29. Bxc4 Ke7 30. b4 Kd6 31. Kd4 h5 32. Be2 h4 33. a4 Bd7 34. a5 f5 35. Bd3


35. ... g4 36. hxg4 fxg4 37. Be2 g3 38. Bf1 Bf5 39. Ke3 Ke5 40. b5 Be4 41. b6 axb6 42. axb6 cxb6 43. d6 Bc6. Les Blancs abandonnent. 0 : 1. (Notes by La Régence, N. 2, February 15, 1856, pages 53-54).

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

The Accidental Tourist


Notes by Johann Jacob Löwenthal


CHESS IN ITALY

The two lively games which we have the pleasure of presenting here, form part of a selection from many recently played in Florence, for which we are indebted to an esteemed correspondent, “A. F.”, whose former contributions, in the shape of some elegant and ingenious problems, have already made his signature agreeably known to the readers of this magazine. The whole of the games in question, are played according to the mode in the use throughout England, Germany and France; for the amateurs of Florence, without any disrespect to the Classic Italian School, have bravely set their countrymen the example of submitting to the rules of play which are adopted by the Chess community throughout the rest of Europe.
Considering the extreme rarity with which Chess communications reach us from Italy, it is a notewhorty fact, that within only a few days of the arrival of the games forwarded by our Florentine friend, we had the gratification of receiving a MSS. collection of no less than fifty fine games played at Rome, which have been collected by Signor Dubois, and presented by that distinguished player to the Editor in a manner so flattering and graceful
“As made the things more rich”.

Baruch – Gerolamo Tassinari
Florence, 1853
Evans Gambit C51

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. 0-0 d6 7. d4 exd4 8. cxd4 Bb6 9. Bb2 Nf6 10. d5 Ne7 11. Bxf6 gxf6 12. Nbd2 Ng6 13. Bb5+ Bd7 14. Bxd7+ Qxd7 15. Nc4 Nf4 16. Nxb6 axb6 17. Nh4 Rg8 18. Qf3 Qg4 19. Qxg4 Rxg4 20. g3 Ne2+ 21. Kg2 Rxe4 22. Kf3 Re5 23. Rfe1 Nc3 24. Rxe5+ fxe5. And after a few more moves White surrendered.

Baruch – Gerolamo Tassinari
Florence, 1853
Evans Gambit C51

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. 0-0 d6 7. d4 exd4 8. cxd4 Bb6 9. Bb2 Nf6 10. Nbd2 0-0 11. d5 Ne7 12. Bxf6 gxf6 13. Nh4 Ng6 14. Qh5 Qe7 15. Nf5 Qe5 16. g3 Bxf5 17. exf5 Ne7 18. Bd3 Qc3 19. Ne4. The game now becomes extremely animated and interesting. 19. ... Qe5 20. Rae1 Nxf5 21. Nxf6+. 21. Ng5, it appears to us, must have given White a winning superiority. 21. ... Qxf6 22. Bxf5 h6 23. Re4 Kg7 24. Rg4+ Kh8 25. Bg6. Ingenious. 25. ... Qg7 26. Bc2 Qf6 27. Bg6 Qg7 28. Bxf7. White might have drawn the game now by persisting in moving the Bishop to c2 and g6. 28. ... Qxf7 29. Qxh6+ Qh7 30. Qg5 Rf5 31. Qd2 Rg8 32. Qc3+ Rg7 33. Kh1 Kg8 34. Rh4 Qg6 35. Re1 Rxf2 36. Rhe4


36. ... Rf1+ 37. Kg2 Rg1+. Mr. Tassinari plays the termination very neatly. 38. Rxg1 Qxe4+ 39. Kf1 Rf7+. And White surrenders. 0 : 1. (Johann Jacob Löwenthal, The Chess Player’s Chronicle, Vol. 1, 1854, pages 168-171).

Smooth


Notes by Johann Jacob Löwenthal


Gerolamo Tassinari – Francesco Discart
1853
Spanish C64

The annexed game, played by Signori Discart and Tassinari, is from the selection contributed by our ingenious friend, Signor A. F—, of Florence.

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Bc5 4. c3 Nge7 5. 0-0 0-0 6. d4 exd4 7. cxd4 Bb6 8. d5 Nb8 9. d6. This certainly serves to cramp Black’s movements, but at the same time it breaks up the adverse centre. 9. ... cxd6 10. Qxd6. Ed. Note: Even stronger is 10. Bf4 – claimed by Morphy as “improvement on that given in the leading treatises of the day” – 10. ... Bc7 11. Nc3 a6 12. Bc4 b5 13. Bb3 Bb7 14. Bxd6 Bxd6 15. Qxd6 h6 16. Rad1 Nc8 17. Qf4 Nb6 18. Ne5 Qf6 19. Qxf6 gxf6 20. Ng4 Kg7 21. Nxf6 Bc6 22. e5 a5 23. Rd3 Rh8 24. Ncd5 Nc4 25. Bxc4 bxc4 26. Rg3+ Kf8 27. Nb6 Ra7 28. Rd1 Bb5 29. Rd4 Rc7 30. Rdg4 1 : 0 P. C. Morphy – Schulten, New York 1857. 10. ... Nbc6 11. Bf4 Ng6 12. Bg3 Re8 13. Nc3 Re6 14. Qd3 Nce5 15. Nxe5 Nxe5 16. Bxe5. 16. Qd5 would have been better play. Black could afterwards have played Kg1-h1, and f2-f4, with a fine attacking position. 16. ... Rxe5 17. Rad1 Rh5 18. Bxd7 Bxd7 19. Qxd7


19. ... Qh4. The attack and counter-attack kept up for the next few moves, render this part of the game exceedingly amusing. 20. h3 Rg5 21. Rd5 Rg6 22. Rf5. Black’s main object is to plant his Queen at g3, which would be at once a decisive blow. In this he is cleverly baffled, and not by merely defensive strokes, but by a vigorous and well-sustained assault on his own territory. 22. ... Rf8 23. Nd5. Threatening a fatal check at e7. 23. ... Bd8 24. Rf4 Qg5 25. Rg4 Qe5 26. Rxg6 fxg6 27. Qxb7 Kh8 28. Qb4 Re8 29. f3 Bh4 30. Qc3 Qb8 31. Rc1 Qg3 32. Rf1 Qb8 33. b3 h5 34. Qc7 Qxc7 35. Nxc7 Rc8 36. Nd5 Rc2 37. a4 Rb2 38. b4 Bg3 39. Rc1 Kg8 40. Kf1 Rf2+ 41. Kg1 Rb2 42. b5 Kf7 43. Nc3 Ke6 44. a5 Be5 45. Kf1 Bxc3 46. Rxc3 Rxb5 47. Rc6+ Ke5 48. Rxg6. And White surrendered. 1 : 0. (Johann Jacob Löwenthal, The Chess Player’s Chronicle, Vol. 1, 1854, pages 240-242).

Thursday, October 2, 2014

Nemo propheta in patria

Gerolamo Tassinari – Jean Adolphe de la Roche
Paris, 1855
Sicilian Defence B21

1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. Nf3. Staunton’s “Handbook” recommended 3. Qxd4. Tassinari prefers the much stronger Morphy’s move. 3. ... e5 4. Bc4 Qc7 5. Bb3 Nf6 6. 0-0 h6? “A loss of time. 6. ... Be7 is likely to be preferable”, observes the Schachzeitung, August 1855, page 256. 7. c3! Thematic and powerful! 7. ... dxc3 8. Nxc3 a6 9. Be3 d6. Oblivious to the imminent disaster. 10. Rc1. Sic et simpliciter. Henceforth it’s just a matter of technique; nevertheless the demolition of the enemy position by Tassinari is impressive. 10. ... Qd8 11. Nd5! It was not bad either 11. Nxe5, but Tassinari prefers to tighten the grip. 11. ... Nxd5 12. Qxd5 Be6 13. Qxb7 Nd7 14. Bxe6 fxe6


15. Rc7 Rb8 16. Qc6. Black is in Zugzwang. 16. ... g5 17. Ba7. A last finesse. 17. ... Ra8 18. Rxd7 Qxd7 19. Qxa8+ Kf7 20. Bb6 Qb5 21. Qa7+ Be7 22. b3 Qc6 23. h3 Rc8 24. Ba5 Qxe4 25. Qxa6 Rc2 26. Re1 Qf5 27. Bb6 g4 28. hxg4 Qxg4 29. Rxe5 Qb4 30. Re1 Rc6 31. Qe2 e5 32. Be3 Rc8 33. Rc1 1 : 0. A beautiful little game! As usual, the partie was played at the Café de la Régence.

Sunday, September 21, 2014

瑪琪雅朵咖啡 (Caffè macchiato)

Gerolamo Tassinari – James Thompson
Paris, 1855
Evans Gambit C52

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4!? Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. d4. Howard Staunton’s idea. 6. ... exd4 7. 0-0 Bb6. A camouflage. 7. ... d3 transposes into Anderssen – Dufresne, Berlin 1852 — the Evergreen Game! — and 7. ... d6 8. cxd4 Bb6 into the so-called Normal Position — in fact a “tabiya”. 8. Ba3!? An original idea. After 8. cxd4 d6 White can choose among 9. Bb2, 9. d5 (Anderssen), 9. h3 (McDonnell) and 9. Nc3 (Morphy). 8. ... d3?! I don’t like this move. In another partie of the series the American player rightly preferred 8. ... d6 9. e5 Nxe5 10. Re1 Be6 11. Nxe5 dxe5 12. Bxe6 fxe6 13. Qh5+ g6 14. Qxe5 Qf6 with some advantage to Black, Tassinari – Thompson, Paris 1855. 9. Qb3 Nh6 10. e5 Na5 11. Qa4 Nxc4 12. Qxc4 c5 13. Qd5. Clearly not 13. Bxc5?? on account of 13. ... Qc7−+ and finis. 13. ... Qc7 14. Nbd2 0-0 15. Nc4. “Mr. Tassinari will keep his advantage to the end with great vigor and skill”, wrote — a little too hastily — La Régence. 15. ... Nf5 16. Qxd3 Ne7 17. Ng5 Ng6 18. f4 h6


19. Nxf7! Well played! 19. ... Rxf7? The crisis. Correct is 19. ... d5! 20. Nxh6+!? (White can play more confidently 20. Qxg6 Qxf7 21. Qxf7+ Kxf7 22. Nd6 Rc7 23. f5 with a slight plus) 20. ... Kh7 21. Qxd5 gxh6 23. e6 and White has interesting compensation for his material disadvantage. 20. Qxg6 Rf8 21. Nd6. Now it’s over. 21. ... a6 22. c4 Ba5 23. Bb2 b5 24. f5 1 : 0. Source: La Régence, No. 5, May 1856, 15, page 144.