Saturday, January 24, 2026
Trip trap
Roberto Cosulich – Francesco Scafarelli
7th Italian Team Chess Championship; Monticelli Terme, April 1966
Sicilian Defence B56
7th Italian Team Chess Championship; Monticelli Terme, April 1966
Sicilian Defence B56
Notes and punctuation by International Master Francesco Scafarelli, Le mie 50 Siciliane, Editrice Scacchistica Internazionale, Napoli, 1980, p. 50.
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be3 e5 7. Ndb5 a6 8. Na3 Ng4 9. Nc4! Nxe3 10. Nxe3 Be7 11. Ncd5 Be6 12. c3! 0-0 13. h4 h6 14. g3 b5 15. Bd3 Rb8 16. b4 Re8 17. Qe2 Qc8 18. 0-0 Bd8 19. a4 Qb7 20. axb5 axb5 21. Rfd1 Ne7 22. c4 Nc6 23. cxb5 Nd4 24. Qf1 Qd7 25. f3! Nxb5 26. Bxb5 Rxb5 27. Ra6 Qb7 28. Ra7 Qxa7 29. Qxb5 Kf8 30. Kh1?
Editor’s note: Scafarelli’s question mark is perhaps out of place, but there is no doubt that 30. Kf1 would prevent the next irruption of the Black Queen on f2.
30. ... Be7 31. Rc1 Bxd5 32. Nxd5 Qf2! 33. Qf1 Qxg3 34. b5 Bxh4? (34. ... Qxh4+)
35. b6 Bg5 36. Rc2! Rb8 37. b7
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. Be3 e5 7. Ndb5 a6 8. Na3 Ng4 9. Nc4! Nxe3 10. Nxe3 Be7 11. Ncd5 Be6 12. c3! 0-0 13. h4 h6 14. g3 b5 15. Bd3 Rb8 16. b4 Re8 17. Qe2 Qc8 18. 0-0 Bd8 19. a4 Qb7 20. axb5 axb5 21. Rfd1 Ne7 22. c4 Nc6 23. cxb5 Nd4 24. Qf1 Qd7 25. f3! Nxb5 26. Bxb5 Rxb5 27. Ra6 Qb7 28. Ra7 Qxa7 29. Qxb5 Kf8 30. Kh1?
Editor’s note: Scafarelli’s question mark is perhaps out of place, but there is no doubt that 30. Kf1 would prevent the next irruption of the Black Queen on f2.
30. ... Be7 31. Rc1 Bxd5 32. Nxd5 Qf2! 33. Qf1 Qxg3 34. b5 Bxh4? (34. ... Qxh4+)
35. b6 Bg5 36. Rc2! Rb8 37. b7
37. ... Qh4+?
Editor’s note: Self-trapping the Queen, but, as two students of the Associazione Culturale “Il Delta della Luna” noted, the correct defence was by no means obvious, i.e, 37. ... Bd8!! (Niccolò & Riccardo), so as to reply to 38. Rc8? with 38. ... Qh4+! 39. Kg2 Rxb7 and it’s Black who wins!
38. Rh2 Qg3 39. Rh3 1–0.
Editor’s note: Self-trapping the Queen, but, as two students of the Associazione Culturale “Il Delta della Luna” noted, the correct defence was by no means obvious, i.e, 37. ... Bd8!! (Niccolò & Riccardo), so as to reply to 38. Rc8? with 38. ... Qh4+! 39. Kg2 Rxb7 and it’s Black who wins!
38. Rh2 Qg3 39. Rh3 1–0.
Friday, January 23, 2026
Incredible, but possible
Professor Mauro Berni (Genoa, Italy) shared some pages from a booklet entitled Le mie 50 Siciliane by Francesco Scafarelli that combines history and not always happy endings.
Roberto Cosulich – Francesco Scafarelli
8th Italian Team Chess Championship; Recoaro Terme, May 1967
Sicilian Defence B75
8th Italian Team Chess Championship; Recoaro Terme, May 1967
Sicilian Defence B75
Notes by Scafarelli, Le mie 50 Siciliane, Editrice Scacchistica Internazionale, Napoli, 1980, pp. 40-41 and pp. 49-50.
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bc4 Bd7 7. Be3 g6. Preferable is 7. ... Ng4 8. 0-0 or 8. Nxc6. It is more convenient for Black to submit himself to attack on the f-file by eliminating the e3-Bishop, than to deal with heterogeneous castling.
8. f3! Bg7 9. Qd2. Now White’s position is ideal for attacking on the Kingside.
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bc4 Bd7 7. Be3 g6. Preferable is 7. ... Ng4 8. 0-0 or 8. Nxc6. It is more convenient for Black to submit himself to attack on the f-file by eliminating the e3-Bishop, than to deal with heterogeneous castling.
8. f3! Bg7 9. Qd2. Now White’s position is ideal for attacking on the Kingside.
9. ... Na5 10. Bb3 Nxb3. Or 10. ... Rc8 11. 0-0-0 Na5 12. h4 b5 13. Kb1 Nc4 14. Qe2 b5 15. Bg5 Nh7 16. Bc1 e5 17. Nf5 gxf5 18. Bxc4 Rxc4 19. Rxd6 Rc6 20. Rd3 Qc8 21. Rhd1 Be6 22. Rd8+ Qxd8 23. Rxd8+ Kxd8 24. Nd5 Kd7 25. Qe3 Bxd5 26. exd5 Rc7 27. Qd3 e4 28. fxe4 Re8 29. Qf3 fxe4 30. Qf5+ Kd8 31. Be3 Nf8 32. d6 Rb7 33. Qd5 Rb8 34. Qxf7 1–0 Pérez – Scafarelli, 2nd Costa del Sol Tournament, Torremolinos 1962.
11. axb3 h5. Preventing g2-g4.
12. h4 a6 13. 0-0-0 Rc8 14. Nd5 Nxd5. Questionable. More interesting is 14. ... Bc6.
15. exd5 0-0. Black cannot abstain himself from castling because of the e-file.
16. g4 Rc5? An oversight in a difficult position after that, as consequence of Black’s castling, the g2-g4 advance regained purpose.
17. Nc6! bxc6. Editor’s note: 17. ... Rxc6! 18. dxc6 Bxc6 seems most acceptable to Black.
18. Bxc5 cxd5. If 18. ... dxc5 19. dxc6!.
19. Be3 d4. Editor’s note: 19. ... hxg4! 20. h5! gxf3 21. hxg6 fxg6 22. Qxd5+ Rf7 23. Bh6 Qf8 24. Bxg7 Qxg7 25. Rd2 Bg4 26. Rdh2 Bh5 is the cold-blooded defence recommended by the mighty engines, but Scafarelli may well be excused for having been afraid of it.
20. Bxd4 Bxd4 21. Qxd4 Qa5 22. Kb1 Rc8 23. Rd3 Qc5. Black is again compelled to simplification.
24. Qxc5 Rxc5 25. Re1 hxg4 26. fxg4 Kf8 27. Rd4 Rc6 28. c4 e5 29. Rxe5? An unnecessary sacrifice.
29. ... dxe5 30. Rxd7 f5! 31. gxf5 gxf5 32. Kc2 Re6 33. c5 f4 34. Rd6! Re7 35. Rxa6 Kg7! 36. Kd2 e4 37. Ra1 Kf6 38. c6 Rc7 39. Rc1 Ke5 40. b4 Kd4 41. b3? (41. b5)
41. ... e3+ 42. Ke2 f3+ 43. Kxf3 Rf7+ 44. Ke2 Rf2+ 45. Ke1 Rg2? (45. ... Rh2!)
46. Rd1+ (46. Kf1!)
46. ... Ke4
11. axb3 h5. Preventing g2-g4.
12. h4 a6 13. 0-0-0 Rc8 14. Nd5 Nxd5. Questionable. More interesting is 14. ... Bc6.
15. exd5 0-0. Black cannot abstain himself from castling because of the e-file.
16. g4 Rc5? An oversight in a difficult position after that, as consequence of Black’s castling, the g2-g4 advance regained purpose.
17. Nc6! bxc6. Editor’s note: 17. ... Rxc6! 18. dxc6 Bxc6 seems most acceptable to Black.
18. Bxc5 cxd5. If 18. ... dxc5 19. dxc6!.
19. Be3 d4. Editor’s note: 19. ... hxg4! 20. h5! gxf3 21. hxg6 fxg6 22. Qxd5+ Rf7 23. Bh6 Qf8 24. Bxg7 Qxg7 25. Rd2 Bg4 26. Rdh2 Bh5 is the cold-blooded defence recommended by the mighty engines, but Scafarelli may well be excused for having been afraid of it.
20. Bxd4 Bxd4 21. Qxd4 Qa5 22. Kb1 Rc8 23. Rd3 Qc5. Black is again compelled to simplification.
24. Qxc5 Rxc5 25. Re1 hxg4 26. fxg4 Kf8 27. Rd4 Rc6 28. c4 e5 29. Rxe5? An unnecessary sacrifice.
29. ... dxe5 30. Rxd7 f5! 31. gxf5 gxf5 32. Kc2 Re6 33. c5 f4 34. Rd6! Re7 35. Rxa6 Kg7! 36. Kd2 e4 37. Ra1 Kf6 38. c6 Rc7 39. Rc1 Ke5 40. b4 Kd4 41. b3? (41. b5)
41. ... e3+ 42. Ke2 f3+ 43. Kxf3 Rf7+ 44. Ke2 Rf2+ 45. Ke1 Rg2? (45. ... Rh2!)
46. Rd1+ (46. Kf1!)
46. ... Ke4
Editor’s note: It goes without saying that the ending is an elementary book win for White after 47. Rd8, but...
47. c7?? Kf3 48. Kf1 e2+ 0–1. Incredible, but possible. This also is part of the charm of the game of chess.
47. c7?? Kf3 48. Kf1 e2+ 0–1. Incredible, but possible. This also is part of the charm of the game of chess.
Thursday, January 22, 2026
Well, Edna, the Swiss care more for money than you do for tiramisu, but at least they are neutral in all wars
Courtesy of Hamish Skirka
Hecuba
Four-time Women’s World Chess Champion and Peking University lecturer 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) speaking at a session titled What Chess Teaches Humans When Machines Play Better, held on January 21, 2026, at the 56th World Economic Forum in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, alongside Kenneth Rogoff, Maurits C. Boas Chair of International Economics at Harvard University. Photos © World Economic Forum/Thibaut Bouvier. |
Wednesday, January 21, 2026
You know, Edna, as Jack London said, “Life is not always a matter of holding good cards, but sometimes, playing a poor hand well”
Courtesy of Joan Feret
Tuesday, January 20, 2026
Gate to the East
Vladimir Konstantinovich Bagirov – Roberto Cosulich
International Tournament; Naples, December 1977
Nimzo-Indian Defence E30
International Tournament; Naples, December 1977
Nimzo-Indian Defence E30
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bg5. The Leningrad Variation, so named because it was in great favour among the players from that city, including also 10th World Chess Champion Boris Vasilievich Spassky.
4. ... h6 5. Bh4 c5 6. d5 Bxc3+ 7. bxc3 d6 8. Nf3 e5. Wikipedia’s popular assessment is open to question: “Black has achieved a Hübner Variation-like blockade, the difference being that White’s dark-squared Bishop is outside the Pawn chain. The pin on the f6-Knight is very annoying, and Black often breaks it by playing the drastic ... g7-g5, which also clamps down on a potential f2-f4 break by White. This move weakens Black’s Kingside, so rather than castle on that side, Black usually safeguards the King by playing ... Ke8-d8-c7”.
9. Nd2 Nbd7 10. e3 Nf8 11. Bd3 Qe7. If 11. ... Ng6 then 12. Bg3 0-0 13. 0-0 Ne7 14. f4! exf4 15. Rxf4 Ng6 16. Rxf6!? Qxf6 17. Ne4 Qd8 18. Nxd6 with enough compensation for the Exchange, Spassky – B. Larsen, USSR vs. Rest of the World, Belgrade 1970.
4. ... h6 5. Bh4 c5 6. d5 Bxc3+ 7. bxc3 d6 8. Nf3 e5. Wikipedia’s popular assessment is open to question: “Black has achieved a Hübner Variation-like blockade, the difference being that White’s dark-squared Bishop is outside the Pawn chain. The pin on the f6-Knight is very annoying, and Black often breaks it by playing the drastic ... g7-g5, which also clamps down on a potential f2-f4 break by White. This move weakens Black’s Kingside, so rather than castle on that side, Black usually safeguards the King by playing ... Ke8-d8-c7”.
9. Nd2 Nbd7 10. e3 Nf8 11. Bd3 Qe7. If 11. ... Ng6 then 12. Bg3 0-0 13. 0-0 Ne7 14. f4! exf4 15. Rxf4 Ng6 16. Rxf6!? Qxf6 17. Ne4 Qd8 18. Nxd6 with enough compensation for the Exchange, Spassky – B. Larsen, USSR vs. Rest of the World, Belgrade 1970.
12. Qb1!? Quite a good idea — even though, years later, White would prefer to play 12. Bxf6! Qxf6 13. 0-0 Qe7! 14. Qc2 Nd7 15. f4 Nf6 16. Rae1 0-0 17. f5 a6 18. Ne4⩲ with a slight edge, Timman – Romanishin, 9th Interpolis Chess Tournament, Tilburg 1985.
12. ... g5 13. Bg3 Rg8 14. Bf5 Ng6 15. a4 Nh5 16. h3?! An unnecessary weakening of the Kingside. White ought either to exchange or retreat his light-squared Bishop, after which the Black King would have to decide whether to go West (... Ke8-d8-c7), or East (... Ke8-f8-g7-h8), with complex play and reciprocal chances in both cases.
16. ... Bxf5 17. Qxf5 Ng7 18. Qb1 f5 19. f3 0-0-0 20. Bf2 Rdf8 21. a5
12. ... g5 13. Bg3 Rg8 14. Bf5 Ng6 15. a4 Nh5 16. h3?! An unnecessary weakening of the Kingside. White ought either to exchange or retreat his light-squared Bishop, after which the Black King would have to decide whether to go West (... Ke8-d8-c7), or East (... Ke8-f8-g7-h8), with complex play and reciprocal chances in both cases.
16. ... Bxf5 17. Qxf5 Ng7 18. Qb1 f5 19. f3 0-0-0 20. Bf2 Rdf8 21. a5
The rush is on.
21. ... e4! A brilliant positional Pawn sacrifice which vacates the e5-square for the g6-Knight in preparation for a future attack.
22. fxe4 Ne5 23. 0-0? Castling into it. After this mistake, Black’s attack grows irresistible. 23. exf5! still offered White the means to escape the worst: a) 23. ... Nxf5 24. g4 Nf3+! 25. Ke2 (25. Nxf3? Nxe3! would be very bad for White) 25. ... N5d4+! 26. cxd4 Nxd2 27. Qd3 Ne4 (very harsh balanced); or b) 23. ... g4!? (who knows, maybe Cosulich would have played like this) 24. e4 Nxf5! 25. a6! b6 26. exf5 Nd3++ 27. Kf1 Nxf2 28. Kxf2 g3+ 29. Kf3 Qe5 30. Ne4 Rxf5+ 31. K~ Re8 regaining the piece with an easier game to play.
21. ... e4! A brilliant positional Pawn sacrifice which vacates the e5-square for the g6-Knight in preparation for a future attack.
22. fxe4 Ne5 23. 0-0? Castling into it. After this mistake, Black’s attack grows irresistible. 23. exf5! still offered White the means to escape the worst: a) 23. ... Nxf5 24. g4 Nf3+! 25. Ke2 (25. Nxf3? Nxe3! would be very bad for White) 25. ... N5d4+! 26. cxd4 Nxd2 27. Qd3 Ne4 (very harsh balanced); or b) 23. ... g4!? (who knows, maybe Cosulich would have played like this) 24. e4 Nxf5! 25. a6! b6 26. exf5 Nd3++ 27. Kf1 Nxf2 28. Kxf2 g3+ 29. Kf3 Qe5 30. Ne4 Rxf5+ 31. K~ Re8 regaining the piece with an easier game to play.
23. ... g4! 24. h4. 24. hxg4 is also answered by 24. ... Nh5! 25. gxh5 Qg5 26. g3 f4! 27. exf4 Rxf4 with a vehement attack.
24. ... Nh5. Threatening ... g4-g3 followed by ... Qe7xh4.
25. a6 b6 26. Be1. Not 26. g3 on account of 26. ... Nf3+ 27. Nxf3 gxf3 28. Kh2 Nxg3! 29. Bxg3 Rxg3! 30. Kxg3 Qg7+ 31. Kxf3 fxe4+ 32. Ke2 (if 32. Kxe4 then 32. ... Qg6+ followed by mate) 32. ... Qg2+ with mate in two.
26. ... g3 27. Rxf5 Qxh4 28. Nf1. White to play and selfmate in three moves: 28. Rxf8+?? Rxf8 29. Nf1? Qh1+! 30. Kxh1 Rxf1#. However, Bagirov can do little or nothing to prevent the final attack.
28. ... Rxf5 29. exf5 Nf6! The bells toll for His Majesty as Black is threatening ... Nf6-e4-f2.
30. Nxg3 Kc7! No illusion is left.
31. Qc2 Nfg4 32. Qe4 Qh2+ 33. Kf1 h5! 34. Ke2 Nf6 35. Qf4 h4 36. Ne4 Qxg2+ 37. Nf2 Rg4 38. Qh6 Ne4 39. Qh7+ Rg7 40. Qxg7+. Desperation, but 40. Qxh4 Qf3+ 41. Kf1 Ng3+ leads to mate in a few moves.
40. ... Qxg7 41. Nxe4 Qg4+ 0–1.
24. ... Nh5. Threatening ... g4-g3 followed by ... Qe7xh4.
25. a6 b6 26. Be1. Not 26. g3 on account of 26. ... Nf3+ 27. Nxf3 gxf3 28. Kh2 Nxg3! 29. Bxg3 Rxg3! 30. Kxg3 Qg7+ 31. Kxf3 fxe4+ 32. Ke2 (if 32. Kxe4 then 32. ... Qg6+ followed by mate) 32. ... Qg2+ with mate in two.
26. ... g3 27. Rxf5 Qxh4 28. Nf1. White to play and selfmate in three moves: 28. Rxf8+?? Rxf8 29. Nf1? Qh1+! 30. Kxh1 Rxf1#. However, Bagirov can do little or nothing to prevent the final attack.
28. ... Rxf5 29. exf5 Nf6! The bells toll for His Majesty as Black is threatening ... Nf6-e4-f2.
30. Nxg3 Kc7! No illusion is left.
31. Qc2 Nfg4 32. Qe4 Qh2+ 33. Kf1 h5! 34. Ke2 Nf6 35. Qf4 h4 36. Ne4 Qxg2+ 37. Nf2 Rg4 38. Qh6 Ne4 39. Qh7+ Rg7 40. Qxg7+. Desperation, but 40. Qxh4 Qf3+ 41. Kf1 Ng3+ leads to mate in a few moves.
40. ... Qxg7 41. Nxe4 Qg4+ 0–1.
Sunday, January 18, 2026
Saturday, January 17, 2026
You know, Edna, the alien lover belongs to another world and sees double meanings everywhere
Courtesy of 灼也 (@3linteacher)
Friday, January 16, 2026
Alien Love
Four-time Women’s World Chess Champion and Peking University lecturer 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) x “Davos 2026: A World in Transition”: AI is not a competitor but a partner.
Human–AI partnership can solve global challenges 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán), TIME, January 15, 2026 AI has revolutionized the game of chess, transforming how we play and think. Once a feared rival, AI is now an indispensable collaborator. I believe the most powerful force in chess today isn’t a human grandmaster or a supercomputer but the partnership between the two. Pairing human creativity and intuition with AI’s precision and analytical power can achieve results neither could accomplish alone. I’ve experienced the power of this partnership firsthand. During tournament preparation, AI tools often uncover patterns and possibilities I hadn’t considered. Yet, it’s my strategic intuition and understanding of the game’s psychology and nuance that determine which paths to pursue. This collaboration is about complementing each other’s strengths as much as it is about competition. The lessons from chess extend far beyond the board. Whether it’s addressing climate change, combating public health crises or reducing economic inequality, humanity faces challenges too complex for humans or machines to solve alone. By combining AI’s computational power with human empathy, adaptability and creativity, we can unlock solutions to the world’s most pressing problems. I see a future where humans and machines work together to solve challenges, not against each other. Partnerships that combine human ingenuity with AI’s capabilities could help to create a sustainable, inclusive future. |
Thursday, January 15, 2026
Wednesday, January 14, 2026
You see, Edna, in the end a prince has come to woo you
Artwork © CRS3D
The Castle in the Sky
The Gut Weißenhaus in Wangels on the Baltic Sea, Germany, will host, on February 14–15, a 4-game Fischerandom (Freestyle) exhibition match featuring four-time Women’s World Chess Champion 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) playing against the Kazakh star Bibisara Erkhanovna Assaubayeva at a rapid time control (25 minutes plus 10 seconds per move) for a purse of $15,000. If tied after four, play a tie-breaker. For further details and information, click here.
Tuesday, January 13, 2026
No, Edna, they cannot. They don’t even know that all they’re doing is staying glued to the screen like flies on the wall longing for your next glance
Artwork © Nirami (@nirami1)
Plays and Players
侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) – 鹿妙夷 (Lù Miàoyí)
19th Chinese Chess League Division A Finals; Match 深圳鹏城队 (Shēnzhèn Péngchéng Team)–杭州银行队 (Hángzhōu Bank Team); time control: 90 minutes per 40 moves plus 30 minutes for the rest of the game plus 30 seconds per move starting on move 1; 绍兴 (Shàoxīng), January 13, 2026
French Defence C11
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. f4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. Be3 cxd4 8.
Nxd4 Qb6 9. a3 Bc5 10. Ncb5 a6 11. b4 axb5 12. bxc5 Qxc5 13. Qd3 Qe7 14.
Nxb5 0-0 15. Be2 f6 16. exf6 Nxf6 17. 0-0 Bd7 18. a4 Rfc8 19. c3 Na5 20.
Qc2 Nc4 21. Bd4 Ra5 22. Bd3 Rca8 23. Rae1. White could (and perhaps should) play 23. Nc7 Rc8 24. Nb5 offering to repeat moves, but a draw wasn’t the result that 深圳鹏城队 (Shēnzhèn Péngchéng Team) wanted.
23. ... Rxa4 24. Nc7 Ra2
23. ... Rxa4 24. Nc7 Ra2
25. Qc1? Only this is the move that loses the game, although 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) can’t be blamed for not properly appreciating the consequences of 25. Qb3 Rb2 26. Nxd5!! Nxd5 27. Qxc4 Bb5 28. Qxd5 Bc6 29. Bxh7+ Kh8! 30. Qxc6 bxc6 31. Be4 with two very powerful Bishops for a Queen and an unclear situation. She chooses instead a more balanced approach (at least from a material standpoint), but only as long as her c7-Knight can survive...
25. ... Ra1 26. Qxa1. Forced, as both 26. Qc2 Rxe1 27. Rxe1 Ba4 and 26. Bb1 Raa2 lose material.
26. ... Rxa1 27. Rxa1 Qd6 28. Bxc4 dxc4 29. Na8 Nd5
25. ... Ra1 26. Qxa1. Forced, as both 26. Qc2 Rxe1 27. Rxe1 Ba4 and 26. Bb1 Raa2 lose material.
26. ... Rxa1 27. Rxa1 Qd6 28. Bxc4 dxc4 29. Na8 Nd5
That’s all, and it’s enough. White will soon pay the price for her “doomed” Knight.
30. Ra2 Bc6 31. Nb6 Nxc3 32. Bxc3 Qc5+ 33. Rff2 Qxb6 34. h3 Qe3 35. Be5 b5 36. Ra6 Bd5 37. Rd6 c3 38. Rd8+ Kf7 39. Rd7+ Ke8 40. Rc7 Bc4 41. Bxc3 Qxc3 42. Kh2 Qd4 43. Rf3 b4 44. Rg3 Kf8 45. Rc8+ Ke7 46. Rc7+ Kd6 47. Rgxg7 Qxf4+ 48. Kh1 b3 49. Rgf7 Qc1+ 50. Kh2 b2 51. Rfd7+ Ke5 52. Rc5+ Kf6 0–1.
30. Ra2 Bc6 31. Nb6 Nxc3 32. Bxc3 Qc5+ 33. Rff2 Qxb6 34. h3 Qe3 35. Be5 b5 36. Ra6 Bd5 37. Rd6 c3 38. Rd8+ Kf7 39. Rd7+ Ke8 40. Rc7 Bc4 41. Bxc3 Qxc3 42. Kh2 Qd4 43. Rf3 b4 44. Rg3 Kf8 45. Rc8+ Ke7 46. Rc7+ Kd6 47. Rgxg7 Qxf4+ 48. Kh1 b3 49. Rgf7 Qc1+ 50. Kh2 b2 51. Rfd7+ Ke5 52. Rc5+ Kf6 0–1.
With two wins in a row over 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán), 鹿妙夷 (Lù Miàoyí) dragged her team to the Chinese League’s victory. Photo: 中国棋院杭州分院 (Hángzhōu Branch of China Chess Academy). |
Monday, January 12, 2026
You did it on purpose, Edna. I know you did
Artwork © Disnuts Gang (@disnuts.gang)
Wandering and Wondering
鹿妙夷 (Lù Miàoyí) – 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán)
19th Chinese Chess League Division A Finals; Match 杭州银行队 (Hángzhōu Bank Team)–深圳鹏城队 (Shēnzhèn Péngchéng Team); time control: 90 minutes per 40 moves plus 30 minutes for the rest of the game plus 30 seconds per move starting on move 1; 绍兴 (Shàoxīng), January 12, 2026
Sicilian Defence B22
1. e4 c5 2. c3 d5 3. exd5 Nf6 4. Bb5+ Nbd7 5. d4 Qb6?! (⌓ 5. ... a6 6. Be2 Nxd5)
6. Bc4! cxd4 7. Nf3 Qc5?! 8. Na3 a6? (⌓ 8. ... dxc3 9. 0-0 a6)
9. b4 Qb6 10. Nxd4 Qc7 11. Ne2 Nb6 12. Bb3 Qd8
6. Bc4! cxd4 7. Nf3 Qc5?! 8. Na3 a6? (⌓ 8. ... dxc3 9. 0-0 a6)
9. b4 Qb6 10. Nxd4 Qc7 11. Ne2 Nb6 12. Bb3 Qd8
Black has made five Queen moves in her first twelve moves — not even 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) can afford such luxuries!
13. Nf4 a5 14. 0-0 g6 15. Re1 axb4 16. cxb4 Bg4 17. f3 Bd7 18. Bb2 Bg7 19. d6 e6
13. Nf4 a5 14. 0-0 g6 15. Re1 axb4 16. cxb4 Bg4 17. f3 Bd7 18. Bb2 Bg7 19. d6 e6
20. Bxe6! fxe6. 20. ... 0-0 21. Bb3 leaves White with two Pawns ahead. On the other hand, the text allows White to unleash a devastating attack.
21. Nxe6 Bxe6 22. Rxe6+ Kf8 23. Qb3 Nbd5 24. Bxf6 Bxf6 25. Qxd5 Rxa3 (25. ... Bxa1 26. Re7+−)
26. Rc1 Qb6+ 27. Kh1 Kg7 28. Rc7+ Kh6 29. Qd2+ Bg5 30. f4 Bd8 31. f5+ Kh5. On 31. ... Bg5 there follows 32. Rxh7+!! Kxh7 33. Qxg5+− with unavoidable mate.
32. Qd1+ Kg5 33. Qd2+ Kh5 34. Qd1+ Kg5 35. fxg6 hxg6 36. Rc5+ Kh6 37. Qc1+ Kg7 38. Qxa3 Rf8 39. Qd3 Bf6 40. Rc7+ 1–0.
21. Nxe6 Bxe6 22. Rxe6+ Kf8 23. Qb3 Nbd5 24. Bxf6 Bxf6 25. Qxd5 Rxa3 (25. ... Bxa1 26. Re7+−)
26. Rc1 Qb6+ 27. Kh1 Kg7 28. Rc7+ Kh6 29. Qd2+ Bg5 30. f4 Bd8 31. f5+ Kh5. On 31. ... Bg5 there follows 32. Rxh7+!! Kxh7 33. Qxg5+− with unavoidable mate.
32. Qd1+ Kg5 33. Qd2+ Kh5 34. Qd1+ Kg5 35. fxg6 hxg6 36. Rc5+ Kh6 37. Qc1+ Kg7 38. Qxa3 Rf8 39. Qd3 Bf6 40. Rc7+ 1–0.
A classic of what one must not do: 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) neglected development in the opening and was harshly punished by her opponent. Photo: 新华社 (Xīnhuá News Agency). |
Sunday, January 11, 2026
Oh yes, Edna, as Charles Lamb said, “To pile up honey upon sugar, and sugar upon honey, to an interminable tedious sweetness”
Photo © HELLO DOLLY
Dear Prudence
侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) – 鹿妙夷 (Lù Miàoyí)
19th Chinese Chess League Division A Finals; Match 深圳鹏城队 (Shēnzhèn Péngchéng Team)–杭州银行队 (Hángzhōu Bank Team); time control: 90 minutes per 40 moves plus 30 minutes for the rest of the game plus 30 seconds per move starting on move 1; 绍兴 (Shàoxīng), January 11, 2026
Nimzo-Indian Defence E32
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Qc2 0-0 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. Qxc3 b6 7. Bg5 Bb7
8. e3 h6 9. Bh4 d5 10. cxd5 Bxd5 11. Ne2 c5 12. Bxf6 Qxf6 13. dxc5 Nd7 14.
Qxf6 gxf6?! Or perhaps !? — in any case, 14. ... Nxf6 15. cxb6 Rfb8 seems a safer way of seeking balance.
15. Nf4 Nxc5
15. Nf4 Nxc5
16. Nxd5. More ambitious was 16. b4 followed, as soon as possible, by Bf1-a6, hindering Black’s mobility for some time.
16. ... exd5 17. Rd1 Rac8 18. Be2 Na4 19. b3 Nc3 20. Rd4 Nxe2 21. Kxe2 Rc2+ 22. Rd2 Rfc8 23. Rd1 a5 24. a4 Kf8 25. Rxc2 Rxc2+ 26. Rd2 Rc3 27. Rb2 Rc1 28. Kd2 Rh1 29. g3 Rxh2 30. Kc3 Rh1 31. Rd2 Rc1+ 32. Kd4 Rc5 33. Rb2 h5 34. b4 axb4 35. Rxb4 Kg7 36. Rxb6 Rc4+ 37. Kxd5 Rxa4 38. f4 Ra3 39. Ke4 f5+ 40. Kf3 Rc3 41. Rb2 Ra3 42. Re2 Kg6 43. Kg2 Ra4 44. Rb2 Ra3 45. Rb6+ f6 46. Kf3 Rc3 ½–½.
16. ... exd5 17. Rd1 Rac8 18. Be2 Na4 19. b3 Nc3 20. Rd4 Nxe2 21. Kxe2 Rc2+ 22. Rd2 Rfc8 23. Rd1 a5 24. a4 Kf8 25. Rxc2 Rxc2+ 26. Rd2 Rc3 27. Rb2 Rc1 28. Kd2 Rh1 29. g3 Rxh2 30. Kc3 Rh1 31. Rd2 Rc1+ 32. Kd4 Rc5 33. Rb2 h5 34. b4 axb4 35. Rxb4 Kg7 36. Rxb6 Rc4+ 37. Kxd5 Rxa4 38. f4 Ra3 39. Ke4 f5+ 40. Kf3 Rc3 41. Rb2 Ra3 42. Re2 Kg6 43. Kg2 Ra4 44. Rb2 Ra3 45. Rb6+ f6 46. Kf3 Rc3 ½–½.
The impression is that 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) could have got more than a draw, but she gave priority to securing a positive result for her team. Photo: 新华社 (Xīnhuá News Agency). |
Saturday, January 10, 2026
Saved by the Bell
鹿妙夷 (Lù Miàoyí) – 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán)
19th Chinese Chess League Division A Finals; Match 杭州银行队 (Hángzhōu Bank Team)–深圳鹏城队 (Shēnzhèn Péngchéng Team); time control: 90 minutes per 40 moves plus 30 minutes for the rest of the game plus 30 seconds per move starting on move 1; 绍兴 (Shàoxīng), January 10, 2026
Spanish Game C62
1. e4 Nc6 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 Nf6 4. Nc3 e5 5. Bb5 exd4 6. Nxd4 Bd7 7. Bg5 Be7
8. Nf5 Bxf5 9. exf5 0-0 10. 0-0 Ne5 11. Re1 c6 12. Bf1 Re8 13. a4 Ned7 14.
Qf3 d5 15. Bf4 Bb4 16. Rxe8+ Qxe8 17. Ne2 Bc5
18. Rd1 (⌓ 18. Nc1 Δ Nc1-d3)
18. ... Ne5 19. Qb3 Neg4 20. Bg3 Ne4 (20. ... Nh5 21. Nd4 Qe4)
21. Nd4 Qe7 22. Qf3 Nxg3 23. Qxg4 Bxd4 (23. ... Nxf1 24. Kxf1 Qe5)
24. Rxd4 Nxf1 25. Kxf1 Re8 26. g3 Qf6 27. a5 h5 28. Qf4 Re5 29. Rb4 Qe7 30. Kg2 f6 31. c3 c5 32. Rb5 Qc7 33. b4 Qd7 34. c4 cxb4 35. Rxb4 dxc4 36. Qxc4+ Kh7 37. Qb3 Rxf5 38. Qc2 Qc6+ 39. Qxc6 bxc6 40. Rc4 Rxa5 41. Rxc6 Kg6 42. Rc7 Ra6 43. h4 Kh6 44. Kf3 g5 45. hxg5+ fxg5 46. Kg2 Kg6 47. Rd7 Ra5 48. Rd6+ Kg7 49. Rd7+ Kf6 50. Rd6+ Ke7 51. Rh6 g4 52. f4 Kf7 53. Kf2 Kg7 54. Rc6 Ra2+ 55. Kg1 a5 56. Rc5 Kg6 57. Rg5+ Kh6 58. Rc5 a4 59. Ra5 a3 60. Ra6+ Kg7 61. Kf1 Kf7 62. Kg1 Ke7 63. Kf1 Kd7 64. Kg1 Kc7 65. f5 Kd7 66. f6 Ke8 67. Ra7 Kf8 68. Kf1 Ra1+ 69. Kf2 Ke8 70. Re7+ Kf8 71. Ra7 Ke8 ½–½.
18. ... Ne5 19. Qb3 Neg4 20. Bg3 Ne4 (20. ... Nh5 21. Nd4 Qe4)
21. Nd4 Qe7 22. Qf3 Nxg3 23. Qxg4 Bxd4 (23. ... Nxf1 24. Kxf1 Qe5)
24. Rxd4 Nxf1 25. Kxf1 Re8 26. g3 Qf6 27. a5 h5 28. Qf4 Re5 29. Rb4 Qe7 30. Kg2 f6 31. c3 c5 32. Rb5 Qc7 33. b4 Qd7 34. c4 cxb4 35. Rxb4 dxc4 36. Qxc4+ Kh7 37. Qb3 Rxf5 38. Qc2 Qc6+ 39. Qxc6 bxc6 40. Rc4 Rxa5 41. Rxc6 Kg6 42. Rc7 Ra6 43. h4 Kh6 44. Kf3 g5 45. hxg5+ fxg5 46. Kg2 Kg6 47. Rd7 Ra5 48. Rd6+ Kg7 49. Rd7+ Kf6 50. Rd6+ Ke7 51. Rh6 g4 52. f4 Kf7 53. Kf2 Kg7 54. Rc6 Ra2+ 55. Kg1 a5 56. Rc5 Kg6 57. Rg5+ Kh6 58. Rc5 a4 59. Ra5 a3 60. Ra6+ Kg7 61. Kf1 Kf7 62. Kg1 Ke7 63. Kf1 Kd7 64. Kg1 Kc7 65. f5 Kd7 66. f6 Ke8 67. Ra7 Kf8 68. Kf1 Ra1+ 69. Kf2 Ke8 70. Re7+ Kf8 71. Ra7 Ke8 ½–½.
Friday, January 9, 2026
Hey, Edna, be careful not to catch a cold while flying above the lowest of human passions in your sky of cloudy blue
Courtesy of EUHISTÓRIA
Blancmange
侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) – 谭中怡 (Tán Zhōngyí)
19th Chinese Chess League Division A Finals; Match 深圳鹏城队 (Shēnzhèn Péngchéng Team)–重庆体育彩票队 (Chóngqìng Sports Lottery Team); time control: 90 minutes per 40 moves plus 30 minutes for the rest of the game plus 30 seconds per move starting on move 1; 绍兴 (Shàoxīng), January 9, 2026
Spanish Game C84
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. 0-0 Be7 6. d3 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. a3 Na5 9. Ba2 c5 10. Nc3 Be6 11. Nh4 0-0 12. Nf5 Bxf5 13. exf5 d5 14. Bg5 c4 15. Qe1 Nc6? (15. ... Rc8 16. Bxf6 Bxf6 17. Nxd5 Qxd5 18. Qxa5 Qd4 19. Qb4 e4 20. dxc4 Qxb2 21. Qxb2 Bxb2 22. Rae1 Rfe8 23. cxb5 axb5 24. Re2 Rc5 25. Rd1 h5 26. Bd5 Kf8 27. Bxe4 Rxf5 28. Bxf5 Rxe2 29. Bd3 Re5 30. Rb1 Bxa3 31. Bxb5 ½–½ Ferreira – Suleymanli, 65th Spanish Team Chess Championship, Linares 2024)
16. Rd1 b4 17. axb4 cxd3 18. Bxf6 Bxf6 19. Bxd5
19. ... dxc2? (19. ... Qb6 20. Rxd3 Nxb4 21. Rg3)
20. Bxf7+ Rxf7 21. Rxd8+ Rxd8 22. Qe4 Nd4 23. Rc1 Bg5 24. Rxc2 Nxc2 25. Qxc2+− Rd4 26. Qb3 Kf8 27. Qe6 Re7 28. Qxa6 e4 29. h4 Bxh4 30. g3 Bg5 31. Nd5 Rd1+ 32. Kg2 Rd7 33. Qc8+ Rd8 34. Qc5+ Kf7 35. Nc7 Rc1 36. Qa7 Rd2 37. Ne6+ Be7 38. Ng5+ Ke8 39. Qa8+ Kd7 40. Nxe4 Rxb2 41. Qd5+ Ke8 42. Qg8+ Kd7 43. Nc5+ Rxc5 (43. ... Bxc5 44. Qxg7++−)
44. bxc5 Bf6 45. Qd5+ Kc7 46. c6 Kb6 47. Qd7 1–0.
20. Bxf7+ Rxf7 21. Rxd8+ Rxd8 22. Qe4 Nd4 23. Rc1 Bg5 24. Rxc2 Nxc2 25. Qxc2+− Rd4 26. Qb3 Kf8 27. Qe6 Re7 28. Qxa6 e4 29. h4 Bxh4 30. g3 Bg5 31. Nd5 Rd1+ 32. Kg2 Rd7 33. Qc8+ Rd8 34. Qc5+ Kf7 35. Nc7 Rc1 36. Qa7 Rd2 37. Ne6+ Be7 38. Ng5+ Ke8 39. Qa8+ Kd7 40. Nxe4 Rxb2 41. Qd5+ Ke8 42. Qg8+ Kd7 43. Nc5+ Rxc5 (43. ... Bxc5 44. Qxg7++−)
44. bxc5 Bf6 45. Qd5+ Kc7 46. c6 Kb6 47. Qd7 1–0.
侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) showed a deeper knowledge of the Ruy López than her opponent. Photo detail: 新华社 (Xīnhuá News Agency). |
Thursday, January 8, 2026
Not All Chefs are Cooks
Again on cooks and politics
Giorgio Agamben, Quodlibet, January 8, 2026
It is well to reflect on the phrase attributed to Lenin — though he apparently never uttered it — according to which “every cook can and must learn to govern the state”. Hannah Arendt, commenting the pseudo-Leninist sentence, wrote that in a classless society, “administration would be so simple that any cook could take charge of it”. Lucio Magri rightly observed years later that Lenin’s phrase should be reversed, so as to mean that “state can be run by a cook only insofar as there are no longer any cooks”.
In the only passage where a cook appears in his writings, Lenin actually says something different and differently well developed. “We are not utopians”, he wrote in a 1917 article. “We know that a cook or an unskilled labourer cannot immediately get on with the job of State administration. In this we agree with the Kadets, Breshkovskaia, and Tsereteli. We differ, however, from these citizens in that we demand an immediate break with the prejudiced view that only the rich, or officials chosen from rich families, are capable of administering the state, and carrying on the routine, everyday work of government. We demand that instruction in matters of governing the state be carried out by conscientious workers and soldiers and that this begin at once, i.e., that all working people and all the poor begin promptly to be given access to this instruction”.
As Lenin’s words suggest, the paradigm hidden behind the utopian government of the cook is that of the administrative state, according to which, once the domination of capitalim is eliminated, politics would give way, as Engels also reiterates, to the simple “administration of things”. Or, if you prefer, politics would present itself in the form of the “police”, which, starting with the theorists of police science in the 18th century, is the term which translates the Greek politeia. “Police” we still read in Marcello Adriani’s translation of Plutarch, published at Florence in 1819, “it means the order and arrangement of a city by which its affairs are organised; and so it is said there are three polizie (sorts of government): monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy”.
This is the paradigm of the admnistrative State theorised by Sunstein and Vermeule, which is now imposing itself in advanced industrial societies, where the state seems to be resolved into administration and government, and “politics” to be turned entirely into “police”. It is significant that, just in a state conceived in this sense as a “police state”, the term ends up designating the least edifying aspect of government, i.e., the bodies bound to ultimately ensure, by force, the realisation of the state’s governmental vocation. What we see today with brutal clarity is, in fact, that this very seemingly neutral state, which claims to pursue only the good order of things and mankind, can reveal itself just because of this to be devoid of any kind of limit in its action. The cook is today the quintessential figure of the tyrant.
Politics can never exhaust itself in mere administration, even in the form of good government that inevitably degenerates into bad government. Because it coincides with the free life of human beings, politics is essentially ungovernable and unmanageable. This is why Lorenzetti’s fresco in Siena, so-called of Good Government, depicts dancing maidens in the foreground. “Good government” is no government at all.
Giorgio Agamben, Quodlibet, January 8, 2026
It is well to reflect on the phrase attributed to Lenin — though he apparently never uttered it — according to which “every cook can and must learn to govern the state”. Hannah Arendt, commenting the pseudo-Leninist sentence, wrote that in a classless society, “administration would be so simple that any cook could take charge of it”. Lucio Magri rightly observed years later that Lenin’s phrase should be reversed, so as to mean that “state can be run by a cook only insofar as there are no longer any cooks”.
In the only passage where a cook appears in his writings, Lenin actually says something different and differently well developed. “We are not utopians”, he wrote in a 1917 article. “We know that a cook or an unskilled labourer cannot immediately get on with the job of State administration. In this we agree with the Kadets, Breshkovskaia, and Tsereteli. We differ, however, from these citizens in that we demand an immediate break with the prejudiced view that only the rich, or officials chosen from rich families, are capable of administering the state, and carrying on the routine, everyday work of government. We demand that instruction in matters of governing the state be carried out by conscientious workers and soldiers and that this begin at once, i.e., that all working people and all the poor begin promptly to be given access to this instruction”.
As Lenin’s words suggest, the paradigm hidden behind the utopian government of the cook is that of the administrative state, according to which, once the domination of capitalim is eliminated, politics would give way, as Engels also reiterates, to the simple “administration of things”. Or, if you prefer, politics would present itself in the form of the “police”, which, starting with the theorists of police science in the 18th century, is the term which translates the Greek politeia. “Police” we still read in Marcello Adriani’s translation of Plutarch, published at Florence in 1819, “it means the order and arrangement of a city by which its affairs are organised; and so it is said there are three polizie (sorts of government): monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy”.
This is the paradigm of the admnistrative State theorised by Sunstein and Vermeule, which is now imposing itself in advanced industrial societies, where the state seems to be resolved into administration and government, and “politics” to be turned entirely into “police”. It is significant that, just in a state conceived in this sense as a “police state”, the term ends up designating the least edifying aspect of government, i.e., the bodies bound to ultimately ensure, by force, the realisation of the state’s governmental vocation. What we see today with brutal clarity is, in fact, that this very seemingly neutral state, which claims to pursue only the good order of things and mankind, can reveal itself just because of this to be devoid of any kind of limit in its action. The cook is today the quintessential figure of the tyrant.
Politics can never exhaust itself in mere administration, even in the form of good government that inevitably degenerates into bad government. Because it coincides with the free life of human beings, politics is essentially ungovernable and unmanageable. This is why Lorenzetti’s fresco in Siena, so-called of Good Government, depicts dancing maidens in the foreground. “Good government” is no government at all.
(English translation by I, Robot)
Ambrogio Lorenzetti, Detail from Allegory of Good Government, 1338–1339. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. |
The River Dragon
谭中怡 (Tán Zhōngyí) – 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán)
19th Chinese Chess League Division A Finals; Match 重庆体育彩票队 (Chóngqìng Sports Lottery Team)–深圳鹏城队 (Shēnzhèn Péngchéng Team); time control: 90 minutes per 40 moves plus 30 minutes for the rest of the game plus 30 seconds per move starting on move 1; 绍兴 (Shàoxīng), January 8, 2026
Queen’s Gambit Declined D30
1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e3 e6 5. Bd3 Nbd7 6. b3 Bd6 7. Bb2 0-0 8. 0-0 b6
9. Nc3 Bb7 10. cxd5 cxd5!? 11. Nb5 Be7 12. Ne5 a6 13. Nc3 Ne4 14. Na4 Nxe5 15. dxe5 b5 16. Nc3 f6 17. Qg4 f5 18. Qd1
18. ... d4! 19. exd4 Nxc3 20. Bxc3 Qd5 21. f3 Rac8 22. Bb2 Bd8 23. Rf2 Bb6 24. Bf1 Rfd8 25. a4 Bxd4 26. Bxd4 Qxd4 27. Qxd4 Rxd4 28. axb5 axb5 29. Bxb5 Bd5 30. Ba4 Rb4 31. Rd1 Bxb3 32. Bxb3 Rxb3 ½–½.
Wednesday, January 7, 2026
The Doom Loop
The mistery of power
Giorgio Agamben, Quodlibet, January 7, 2025
Paul’s Second Epistle to the Thessalonians can be read as a prophecy about the current situation in the West. The apostle evokes here “a mistery of anomie”, of “lawlessness”, which is underway, but which will not be fulfilled with the Second Coming of Jesus Christ unless there first appears “the man of lawlessness (ho anthropos tes anomias), the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God”. There is, however, a power which restrains this revelation (Paul simply calls it, without further defining it, “a restrainer — katechon”). This power must therefore be wiped off, for only then “will the impius (anomos, lit. “the lawless”) be revelead, and the Lord Jesus will slay him with the breath of his mouth and destroy him by his coming appearance”.
The theological-political tradition has identified this “power which restrains” with the Roman Empire (as in Jerome and, later, in Carl Schmitt) or with the Church itself (in Ticonius and Augustine). It is evident, in any case, that the power which restrains identifies itself with the institutions which sustain and govern human societies. For this reason, their elimination coincides with the advent of the anomos, a “lawless man” who takes the place of God and “with signs and false wonders” leads to perdition “those who rejected the love of the truth”.
It is possible to see in the mystery of anomie not so much a supratemporal enigma, whose sole sense is that of putting an end to the history, but rather a historical drama (mysterion in Greek means “dramatic action”), which corresponds perfectly to what we are living out today.
Dominant institutions seem to have lost their sense and are literally disappearing, giving way to an anomie, a lawlessness that claims to be legal, so to speak, but that in fact has abdicated all legitimacy. The State (the principle which restrains) and the “lawless” are actually two sides of the same mystery: the mystery of power. As the United States are now unscrupulously showing, the “man of anomie”, the “lawless” designates the figure of state power which, dropping the constitutional and ethical principles that traditionally limited it and, with them, “the love of the truth”, relies on the “signs and false wonders” of weapons and technology. It is this confusion of anarchy and legality in a now-permanent state of exception that we must unmask and make inoperative in any areas.
Giorgio Agamben, Quodlibet, January 7, 2025
Paul’s Second Epistle to the Thessalonians can be read as a prophecy about the current situation in the West. The apostle evokes here “a mistery of anomie”, of “lawlessness”, which is underway, but which will not be fulfilled with the Second Coming of Jesus Christ unless there first appears “the man of lawlessness (ho anthropos tes anomias), the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God”. There is, however, a power which restrains this revelation (Paul simply calls it, without further defining it, “a restrainer — katechon”). This power must therefore be wiped off, for only then “will the impius (anomos, lit. “the lawless”) be revelead, and the Lord Jesus will slay him with the breath of his mouth and destroy him by his coming appearance”.
The theological-political tradition has identified this “power which restrains” with the Roman Empire (as in Jerome and, later, in Carl Schmitt) or with the Church itself (in Ticonius and Augustine). It is evident, in any case, that the power which restrains identifies itself with the institutions which sustain and govern human societies. For this reason, their elimination coincides with the advent of the anomos, a “lawless man” who takes the place of God and “with signs and false wonders” leads to perdition “those who rejected the love of the truth”.
It is possible to see in the mystery of anomie not so much a supratemporal enigma, whose sole sense is that of putting an end to the history, but rather a historical drama (mysterion in Greek means “dramatic action”), which corresponds perfectly to what we are living out today.
Dominant institutions seem to have lost their sense and are literally disappearing, giving way to an anomie, a lawlessness that claims to be legal, so to speak, but that in fact has abdicated all legitimacy. The State (the principle which restrains) and the “lawless” are actually two sides of the same mystery: the mystery of power. As the United States are now unscrupulously showing, the “man of anomie”, the “lawless” designates the figure of state power which, dropping the constitutional and ethical principles that traditionally limited it and, with them, “the love of the truth”, relies on the “signs and false wonders” of weapons and technology. It is this confusion of anarchy and legality in a now-permanent state of exception that we must unmask and make inoperative in any areas.
(English translation by I, Robot)
Konstantin Fyodorovich Yuon, New Planet (New Planet’s Birth), 1921. Courtesy of WikiArt. |
Tuesday, January 6, 2026
Up Close & Personal
Conversation with Sonja Graf
Francesc Armengol i Burguès, La Rambla, February 11, 1936, p. 5
My friend Koltanowski had the good sense to introduce me to Miss Sonja Graf, the German Women’s Champion, who has been in Barcelona for a few days.
I took advantage of the opportunity to ask her for a conversation for La Rambla chess column, which she readily agreed to, and which took place last Tuesday at the Granja Royal, after enjoying a delightful concert given by the Toldrà sextet. Koltanowski, who acted as my interpreter, was a witness to our talk:
— Did you like this tune, Miss Sonja?
— Oh! Charming — she answered me in a strict German and masculine accent, shaking a fist on the table, where there was a small cardboard box, while trying to sing some notes of the zarzuela La del manojo de rosas.
— What is your impression of our country?
— Wonderful. I met always nice people so far. Take note of the names of some of them: Domènech, Cabestany, Calduc, Cardona...
— May I be indiscreet in my questions? It is so strange and unusual that foreigners come to visit us...
— I never hesitate. I am at your command.
— What purposes brought you here?
— To personally get to know your chess community, of which I have great references, as well as to introduce myself to all Catalan fans; and, least but not last, to train with Koltanowski, since I will participate in the Margate and Semmering tournaments.
— When will the Margate tournament start?
— On April 15. Pray note that in the Margate tournament it is very likely that Glòria Velat, Sofia Ruiz and Montserrat Puigcercós will participate in the women’s tournament, and Cabestany, Calduch, Cardona, Domènech and Solà in the men’s tournament.
— And the Semmering one?
— On June 16. It’s noteworthy that only women will play the Semmering tournament. One guest per country. I am currently dealing with the admission of a competitor from your country. I assume that the Grand Hotel Panhans, the organiser of this event, has already received my recommendation.
— Are there significant prizes at stake?
— 200, 150, 100 and 75 dollars, respectively, will be awarded for the first four places. An amount for each won game. As mandatory compensation, second-class travel and accommodation will be paid.
— Miss Graf, may I ask you how old you are?
— Let’s talk chess...
— I ask how old you are because a young lady shouldn’t always be talking chess...
— Well... in Ireland they say I’m twenty-one; in England they say I’m twenty-two. So now it’s up to you to make a choice...
— Since we’re talking about years... When did you begin to play chess?
— I’ve been playing it for like five years.
— Do you remember any brilliant performance?
— You may note that last year I took part in the Margate and Yarmouth tournaments. In the first, which involved several competitors and was held in two stages due to the Preliminaries, I finished third in the Final A. And in the second, which involved twelve competitors, I have the honour of defeating Prins and Klein.
— Do you think you are a good simultaneous player?
— I remember I gave five exhibitions in Ireland. In total, 79 games, twenty-seven draws and ten losses.
— Can you tell me if you are planning to get married?
— Let’s talk chess...
— At least, will you tell me where you were born?
— In Munich.
— And who was your first teacher?
— Dr. Tarrasch.
— His influence would have an effect on some competition...
— It may be noted that in the Vienna tournament of 1933, which was held in a double round-robin format, seven women participated and I took first place.
— In which section did you compete in the Hastings tournaments of 1934/35 and 1935/36?
— In the Major A, Section 1, and Premier Reserves B respectively.
— Would you like a cigarette?
— With pleasure.
— Which technique do you prefer, that of Euwe or Alekhine?
— That of the former World Champion.
— Your favourite player?
— Spielmann.
— Do you think it is good for women to play chess?
— Of course, since I am adept at it... But should be noted that, in general, women are not predisposed to it.
— Would you mind if I say that you remind me of Lilienthal? Your cropped hair, your bearing...
— If you think so, okay; I have no objection to it.
— Can you provide me with a photograph for the sake of the readers of La Rambla?
— Here it is, along with a game that I really like.
Francesc Armengol i Burguès, La Rambla, February 11, 1936, p. 5
My friend Koltanowski had the good sense to introduce me to Miss Sonja Graf, the German Women’s Champion, who has been in Barcelona for a few days.
I took advantage of the opportunity to ask her for a conversation for La Rambla chess column, which she readily agreed to, and which took place last Tuesday at the Granja Royal, after enjoying a delightful concert given by the Toldrà sextet. Koltanowski, who acted as my interpreter, was a witness to our talk:
— Did you like this tune, Miss Sonja?
— Oh! Charming — she answered me in a strict German and masculine accent, shaking a fist on the table, where there was a small cardboard box, while trying to sing some notes of the zarzuela La del manojo de rosas.
— What is your impression of our country?
— Wonderful. I met always nice people so far. Take note of the names of some of them: Domènech, Cabestany, Calduc, Cardona...
— May I be indiscreet in my questions? It is so strange and unusual that foreigners come to visit us...
— I never hesitate. I am at your command.
— What purposes brought you here?
— To personally get to know your chess community, of which I have great references, as well as to introduce myself to all Catalan fans; and, least but not last, to train with Koltanowski, since I will participate in the Margate and Semmering tournaments.
— When will the Margate tournament start?
— On April 15. Pray note that in the Margate tournament it is very likely that Glòria Velat, Sofia Ruiz and Montserrat Puigcercós will participate in the women’s tournament, and Cabestany, Calduch, Cardona, Domènech and Solà in the men’s tournament.
— And the Semmering one?
— On June 16. It’s noteworthy that only women will play the Semmering tournament. One guest per country. I am currently dealing with the admission of a competitor from your country. I assume that the Grand Hotel Panhans, the organiser of this event, has already received my recommendation.
— Are there significant prizes at stake?
— 200, 150, 100 and 75 dollars, respectively, will be awarded for the first four places. An amount for each won game. As mandatory compensation, second-class travel and accommodation will be paid.
— Miss Graf, may I ask you how old you are?
— Let’s talk chess...
— I ask how old you are because a young lady shouldn’t always be talking chess...
— Well... in Ireland they say I’m twenty-one; in England they say I’m twenty-two. So now it’s up to you to make a choice...
— Since we’re talking about years... When did you begin to play chess?
— I’ve been playing it for like five years.
— Do you remember any brilliant performance?
— You may note that last year I took part in the Margate and Yarmouth tournaments. In the first, which involved several competitors and was held in two stages due to the Preliminaries, I finished third in the Final A. And in the second, which involved twelve competitors, I have the honour of defeating Prins and Klein.
— Do you think you are a good simultaneous player?
— I remember I gave five exhibitions in Ireland. In total, 79 games, twenty-seven draws and ten losses.
— Can you tell me if you are planning to get married?
— Let’s talk chess...
— At least, will you tell me where you were born?
— In Munich.
— And who was your first teacher?
— Dr. Tarrasch.
— His influence would have an effect on some competition...
— It may be noted that in the Vienna tournament of 1933, which was held in a double round-robin format, seven women participated and I took first place.
— In which section did you compete in the Hastings tournaments of 1934/35 and 1935/36?
— In the Major A, Section 1, and Premier Reserves B respectively.
— Would you like a cigarette?
— With pleasure.
— Which technique do you prefer, that of Euwe or Alekhine?
— That of the former World Champion.
— Your favourite player?
— Spielmann.
— Do you think it is good for women to play chess?
— Of course, since I am adept at it... But should be noted that, in general, women are not predisposed to it.
— Would you mind if I say that you remind me of Lilienthal? Your cropped hair, your bearing...
— If you think so, okay; I have no objection to it.
— Can you provide me with a photograph for the sake of the readers of La Rambla?
— Here it is, along with a game that I really like.
Anton Kohler – Sonja Graf
Munich City Championship 1933/34; Munich, February 14, 1934
Spanish Game C77
Munich City Championship 1933/34; Munich, February 14, 1934
Spanish Game C77
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. Qe2 Bc5 6. d3 d6 7. h3 Be6 8.
Nc3 h6 9. Be3(a) b5 10. Bb3 Nd4 11. Bxd4 exd4 12. Nd1(b) 0-0 13. c3 dxc3 14. bxc3(c) Re8 15. Nd2 b4! 16. Bxe6(d) Rxe6 17. Nb3 bxc3 18. Nxc5(e) dxc5(f) 19. Ne3(g) Rb8 20. Qc2
Qd4 21. Rc1(h) Nd5!!(i) 22. Nxd5 Rb2! 23. 0-0 Rxc2 and wins. 0–1.
NOTES
(a) Castling was not good because of ... g7-g5.
(b) 12. Nd5 c6 13. Nxf6+ Qxf6 looked good.
(c) It is obvious that White is hoping to get to d3-d4 right away, but has not taken the e-file into account. Sonja Graf is here in her element!
(d) If 16. d4 there naturally follows 16. ... bxc3!.
(e) 18. Nxc3 Bb4 19. Rcl d5! deserved consideration [Translator’s note: Armengol overlooked 19. ... Nd5! which would win on the spot].
(f) Dangerous tripled Pawns!
(g) If 19. Nxc3 there follows 19. ... Qd4 20. Rc1 c4!.
(h) At first glance White regains the Pawn with a good game. But Miss Graf wins the game with a splendid combination.
(i) The decisive move, which wins the Queen and the game. What if now 22. exd5? Here comes the pointe of the combination, since after 22. exd5 Rxe3+! 23. fxe3 Qxe3+ 24. Kd1 Rb2! 25. Re1! apparently it is White who will win and not Black. But there follows 25. ... Qd2+!! 26. Qxd2 Rxd2#!! — a treacherous blow which tears through the darkness.
NOTES
(a) Castling was not good because of ... g7-g5.
(b) 12. Nd5 c6 13. Nxf6+ Qxf6 looked good.
(c) It is obvious that White is hoping to get to d3-d4 right away, but has not taken the e-file into account. Sonja Graf is here in her element!
(d) If 16. d4 there naturally follows 16. ... bxc3!.
(e) 18. Nxc3 Bb4 19. Rcl d5! deserved consideration [Translator’s note: Armengol overlooked 19. ... Nd5! which would win on the spot].
(f) Dangerous tripled Pawns!
(g) If 19. Nxc3 there follows 19. ... Qd4 20. Rc1 c4!.
(h) At first glance White regains the Pawn with a good game. But Miss Graf wins the game with a splendid combination.
(i) The decisive move, which wins the Queen and the game. What if now 22. exd5? Here comes the pointe of the combination, since after 22. exd5 Rxe3+! 23. fxe3 Qxe3+ 24. Kd1 Rb2! 25. Re1! apparently it is White who will win and not Black. But there follows 25. ... Qd2+!! 26. Qxd2 Rxd2#!! — a treacherous blow which tears through the darkness.
(English translation by I, Robot)
Conversa amb Sonja Graf
Professor Mauro Berni (Genoa, Italy) shared with me the reading of the Catalan newspaper La Rambla of Tuesday, February 11 1936, p. 5, where its chess columnist, Francesc Armengol i Burguès, conducted a lengthy and personal interview with Sonja Graf.
You know, Edna, as another proverb says, “What the caterpillar calls the end, the rest of the world calls a butterfly”
Artwork © Pari Horror Animation
Monday, January 5, 2026
Sunday, January 4, 2026
Yet, Edna, one should remember that, as the proverb says, “Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood”
Artwork © Jose-Ramiro
Saturday, January 3, 2026
The Squared Circle
- P. K. Ajith Kumar, “The world is huge, right? It’s not just a chessboard and pieces”, The Hindu, January 3, 2026
As a child prodigy, a dominant World champion and a university professor, 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) has lived many lives — and she is just 31. Still the top-ranked woman, she intends to study neuroscience to understand the connection between the brain and chess patterns. She continues to awe the sport’s fans from time to time, like she did at the Global Chess League recently. She opens up in this conversation about her unique relationship with the game. [Read more]. |
“Chess for me represents not just the results. For instance, there is the beauty and philosophy of chess. That I find is more attractive than winning a game”, 侯逸凡 (Hóu Yìfán) said. Photo: The Hindu. |
End of the Line
The following game was published, among others, in The Chess Player,
No. 16/1977, (31), p. 12, with annotations by the winner, and once again it is thanks to the good offices of Mr. Dominique Thimognier that it reappears here with brief notes by French chess Master and journalist Sylvain Zinser.
Florin Gheorghiu – Roberto Cosulich
1st International Open; Val Thorens, July 1977
English Opening A28
1st International Open; Val Thorens, July 1977
English Opening A28
Notes by Master Sylvain Zinser, Europe Échecs, Nos. 225-226, September-October 1977, p. 297.
1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. d4. This continuation is now abandoned in favour of 4. g3.
4. ... exd4 5. Nxd4 Bb4. Necessary to prevent or delay e2-e4.
6. Bg5 h6 7. Bh4 Bxc3+. Otherwise White, by Ra1-c1 or Qd1-b3, would avoid the shattering of his Pawn structure with a good game.
8. bxc3 Ne5. 8. ... d6 is more precise, forcing White to reveal his intentions in the centre: e2-e3 or f2-f3 followed by e2-e4. Then the manoeuvre ... Nc6-e5-g6 gains more strength.
9. f4! Ng6. After 9. ... Nxc4 10. e4 Ne3 11. Qe2 Nxf1 12. e5 0-0 13. Nf5 gives White a dangerous attack.
10. Bxf6 Qxf6 11. g3 0-0 12. Bg2 c5. 12. ... d6 13. 0-0 Re8 14. Rb1 c6 15. Qd2 Nf8 16. e4 and White is also better.
13. Nb5 d5?! An attempt to rehabilitate the variation.
14. Qxd5 a6
1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. d4. This continuation is now abandoned in favour of 4. g3.
4. ... exd4 5. Nxd4 Bb4. Necessary to prevent or delay e2-e4.
6. Bg5 h6 7. Bh4 Bxc3+. Otherwise White, by Ra1-c1 or Qd1-b3, would avoid the shattering of his Pawn structure with a good game.
8. bxc3 Ne5. 8. ... d6 is more precise, forcing White to reveal his intentions in the centre: e2-e3 or f2-f3 followed by e2-e4. Then the manoeuvre ... Nc6-e5-g6 gains more strength.
9. f4! Ng6. After 9. ... Nxc4 10. e4 Ne3 11. Qe2 Nxf1 12. e5 0-0 13. Nf5 gives White a dangerous attack.
10. Bxf6 Qxf6 11. g3 0-0 12. Bg2 c5. 12. ... d6 13. 0-0 Re8 14. Rb1 c6 15. Qd2 Nf8 16. e4 and White is also better.
13. Nb5 d5?! An attempt to rehabilitate the variation.
14. Qxd5 a6
15. Nd6! A game Chukaev – Buslaev, Riga 1964, continued with 15. Nc7 and Black obtained excellent chances by 15. ... Nxf4 16. gxf4 Qh4+ 17. Kd1 Rd8 18. Nxa8 Be6 19. Nc7 Bxd5 20. Nxd5 Qxf4 etc.
15. ... Qxc3+ 16. Kf2 Bg4 17. Qxc5! Bxe2 18. Qe3! 18. Kxe2? Rae8+! 19. Nxe8 Rxe8+ 20. Kf2 Qb2+! and 21. Kf3? is not possible because of 21. ... Qe2# mate.
18. ... Qb4 19. c5 Bd3 20. Rhc1! Bb5 21. Bxb7 Rab8 22. Rab1 Qa4 23. Bd5 Ne7 24. Bb3 (24. Qxe7 Qd4+ and ... Qd4xd5)
24. ... Qa5 25. Nxb5! Nf5 26. Qd3 axb5 27. Qxf5 Qd2+ 28. Kg1 Qe3+ 29. Kg2 Rbd8 30. Rc2 Rd3 31. Rf1 1–0.
15. ... Qxc3+ 16. Kf2 Bg4 17. Qxc5! Bxe2 18. Qe3! 18. Kxe2? Rae8+! 19. Nxe8 Rxe8+ 20. Kf2 Qb2+! and 21. Kf3? is not possible because of 21. ... Qe2# mate.
18. ... Qb4 19. c5 Bd3 20. Rhc1! Bb5 21. Bxb7 Rab8 22. Rab1 Qa4 23. Bd5 Ne7 24. Bb3 (24. Qxe7 Qd4+ and ... Qd4xd5)
24. ... Qa5 25. Nxb5! Nf5 26. Qd3 axb5 27. Qxf5 Qd2+ 28. Kg1 Qe3+ 29. Kg2 Rbd8 30. Rc2 Rd3 31. Rf1 1–0.
You know, Edna, there are things one can’t say to everyone
Photo: 𝟛𝟛𝕒𝕚𝟙𝟞 (@33ai16)
Friday, January 2, 2026
Snow White and the Prince that never came
The following game, played many years ago in the 1st International Open at Val Thorens (France), is not included nor mentioned in public databases, and it’s only thanks to the kindness of Mr. Dominique Thimognier, editor of the excellent website Héritage des Echecs Français, that it appears here.
Jean-Luc Roos – Roberto Cosulich
1st International Open; Val Thorens, July 1977
Sicilian Defence B37
1st International Open; Val Thorens, July 1977
Sicilian Defence B37
Notes by Grandmaster Bachar Kouatly, Europe Échecs, Nos. 225-226, September-October 1977, p. 298.
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. c4 Bg7 6. Nc2 Nf6 7. Nc3 d6 8. Be2 0-0 9. 0-0 Nd7 10. Bg5. A rarely played but interesting move.
10. ... Nc5 11. f3 Be6. More precise was 11. ... Bd7 with the plan ... Ra8-b8, ... a7-a6, ... b7-b5, or the advance ... f7-f5.
12. Qd2 Qa5? 13. Rab1 Bxc3. Weak, but after 13. ... Qd8 14. b4 White is fine.
14. bxc3 Rfc8 15. Nd4 Qc7. Black’s strategy is refuted.
16. Bh6! A move which paves the way for a very strong attack. The weakness of the dark squares becomes now appreciable.
16. ... b6. 16. ... f6 ought to be tried out.
17. Nxe6 fxe6 (17. ... Nxe6 18. f4)
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. c4 Bg7 6. Nc2 Nf6 7. Nc3 d6 8. Be2 0-0 9. 0-0 Nd7 10. Bg5. A rarely played but interesting move.
10. ... Nc5 11. f3 Be6. More precise was 11. ... Bd7 with the plan ... Ra8-b8, ... a7-a6, ... b7-b5, or the advance ... f7-f5.
12. Qd2 Qa5? 13. Rab1 Bxc3. Weak, but after 13. ... Qd8 14. b4 White is fine.
14. bxc3 Rfc8 15. Nd4 Qc7. Black’s strategy is refuted.
16. Bh6! A move which paves the way for a very strong attack. The weakness of the dark squares becomes now appreciable.
16. ... b6. 16. ... f6 ought to be tried out.
17. Nxe6 fxe6 (17. ... Nxe6 18. f4)
18. f4! Nxe4 19.
Qe3 Nc5 20. Bg4 Qd7. If 20. ... Nd8 21. Qd4 wins.
21. f5! exf5 22. Rxf5. On 22. Bxf5 e6 is annoying; if now 22. ... e6 23. Rxc5 followed by Bg4xe6+, or 22. ... gxf5 23. Qg5+ wins.
22. ... Qc7 23. Rbf1 Ne5 24. Rxe5! dxe5 25. Bxc8 Qxc8. If 25. ... Rxc8 26. Qf3! and mate is unavoidable.
26. Qxe5 1–0. If 26. ... Ne6 27. Rf8+ Qxf8 28. Bxf8 Nxf8 29. Qd5+ wins. A pretty game by the French university champion against the runner-up in the Italian championship.
21. f5! exf5 22. Rxf5. On 22. Bxf5 e6 is annoying; if now 22. ... e6 23. Rxc5 followed by Bg4xe6+, or 22. ... gxf5 23. Qg5+ wins.
22. ... Qc7 23. Rbf1 Ne5 24. Rxe5! dxe5 25. Bxc8 Qxc8. If 25. ... Rxc8 26. Qf3! and mate is unavoidable.
26. Qxe5 1–0. If 26. ... Ne6 27. Rf8+ Qxf8 28. Bxf8 Nxf8 29. Qd5+ wins. A pretty game by the French university champion against the runner-up in the Italian championship.
Addio a Lugano
Werner Hug – Roberto Cosulich
Match Switzerland–Italy; Lugano, March 9, 1974
Sicilian Defence B31
Match Switzerland–Italy; Lugano, March 9, 1974
Sicilian Defence B31
Comments in quotation marks by Thurgauer Zeitung, Volume 176, No. 80, April 5, 1974, p. 31.
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 g6 4. 0-0 Bg7 5. c3 Nf6 6. Re1 0-0 7. h3!? Or 7. d4 at once, on which there can follow 7. ... cxd4 8. cxd4 d5 9. e5 Ne4 10. Nc3 Nxc3 11. bxc3 Qa5? (11. ... Na5!= Hug – Hort, 2nd Gran Torneo Internacional de Ajedrez “Ciudad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria”, Las Palmas 1973) 12. Qb3 Bg4 13. Nd2 Rfc8 14. h3 Bf5 15. g4 Bc2 16. Qb2 Nd8 17. Qxc2 Qxb5 18. Nb3 Qa4 19. Bg5 Rc7 20. Qd2 Ne6 21. Be3 Rac8 22. Rac1 b6 23. f4 Nd8 24. f5 Qe8 25. Re2 e6 26. f6 Bf8 27. Qe1 Ba3 28. Rcc2 Nb7 29. Bc1 Bf8 30. Bd2 Rc4 31. Qc1 Qa4 32. Bh6 Qa3 33. Qd2 Na5 34. Bxf8 Qxf8 35. Nxa5 bxa5 36. Re1 Qa3 37. Rb1! R4c7? (37. ... Qf8 38. h4 h6 39. Rb7±) 38. Rb4!! Kf8 (38. ... axb4 39. Qh6+−) 39. Rb3 Qa4 40. Qh6+ Ke8 41. Qxh7 Kd8 42. h4 Rd7 43. Rcb2 Qc6 44. Rb8 1–0 Cordovil – Cosulich, 21st Chess Olympiad, Nice 1974.
7. ... Ne8. “The usual move at this point is 7. ... d5. The Knight’s move leads to a transposition of moves”.
In Sydor – Cosulich, 3rd International Tournament, Bari 1972, a draw was agreed after 7. ... d6 8. d4 cxd4 9. cxd4 Qb6 10. Nc3 a6 11. Bf1 Rd8 ½–½. However, 12. Na4 followed by d4-d5 would seem to give White a crushing bind.
8. d4 cxd4 9. cxd4 Nc7 10. Bf1 d5 11. e5 Ne6 12. Nc3 f6. “Consideration should be given to 12. ... a6 in order to keep the Bishop away from b5 and to maintain pressure on d4 and e5”.
13. exf6 exf6. If, instead, 13. ... Bxf6 then 14. Be3 Qd6 15. Rc1 Kh8 16. g3 Bd7 17. Bg2 Rad8 18. Qd2 Bc8 19. b3 Qb4 20. Rcd1 Bg7 21. Qd3 Nc5 22. Qd2 Ne4? (22. ... Ne6) 23. Nxe4 dxe4 24. Ng5 Qxd2 25. Rxd2 Nxd4 (25. ... Bxd4 26. Bxd4+ Nxd4 27. Rxe4⩲) 26. Red1 e5 27. Nxe4 b6 28. Kh1 Bb7 29. Ng5 Bxg2+ 30. Kxg2 Rde8 31. Bxd4 exd4 32. Nf3 Rd8? (32. ... Re4 33. Nxd4? Bxd4 34. Rxd4 Re2=) 33. Nxd4 Bxd4 34. Rxd4 Rxd4 35. Rxd4 Rf7 36. f4 Rc7 37. Kf3 Kg7 38. Ke4 Kf6 39. Rc4 Rd7 40. g4 h6 41. h4 Rd6 42. Rc7 1–0 Ribli – Radojević, 4th Ivan Parčetić Memorial, Sombor 1970.
14. Bb5! Apparently stronger than 14. b3 f5 15. Ba3 Re8 16. Rc1 Bd7 17. Nxd5 Nexd4 18. Rxe8+ Bxe8 19. Nxd4 Bxd4 20. Rxc6 Bxc6 21. Qxd4 Bxd5 22. Bb2 Kf7 23. Bc4 Bxc4 24. Qxc4+ Kf8 25. Qc3 Qd1+ 26. Kh2 Qd6+ 27. g3 Rd8 28. Qg7+ Ke8 29. Bf6 Rd7 30. Qg8+ Qf8 31. Qe6+ Re7 ½–½ Ciocâltea – Ghitescu, International Tournament, Bucharest 1966.
14. ... f5 15. Bxc6 bxc6 16. Na4. “White’s plan is clearly outlined: to occupy the dark squares and, if possible, reduce material until remaining with only a White Knight against Black’s light-squared Bishop”.
16. ... f4 17. b3 Qd6 18. Bb2 Rf5
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 g6 4. 0-0 Bg7 5. c3 Nf6 6. Re1 0-0 7. h3!? Or 7. d4 at once, on which there can follow 7. ... cxd4 8. cxd4 d5 9. e5 Ne4 10. Nc3 Nxc3 11. bxc3 Qa5? (11. ... Na5!= Hug – Hort, 2nd Gran Torneo Internacional de Ajedrez “Ciudad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria”, Las Palmas 1973) 12. Qb3 Bg4 13. Nd2 Rfc8 14. h3 Bf5 15. g4 Bc2 16. Qb2 Nd8 17. Qxc2 Qxb5 18. Nb3 Qa4 19. Bg5 Rc7 20. Qd2 Ne6 21. Be3 Rac8 22. Rac1 b6 23. f4 Nd8 24. f5 Qe8 25. Re2 e6 26. f6 Bf8 27. Qe1 Ba3 28. Rcc2 Nb7 29. Bc1 Bf8 30. Bd2 Rc4 31. Qc1 Qa4 32. Bh6 Qa3 33. Qd2 Na5 34. Bxf8 Qxf8 35. Nxa5 bxa5 36. Re1 Qa3 37. Rb1! R4c7? (37. ... Qf8 38. h4 h6 39. Rb7±) 38. Rb4!! Kf8 (38. ... axb4 39. Qh6+−) 39. Rb3 Qa4 40. Qh6+ Ke8 41. Qxh7 Kd8 42. h4 Rd7 43. Rcb2 Qc6 44. Rb8 1–0 Cordovil – Cosulich, 21st Chess Olympiad, Nice 1974.
7. ... Ne8. “The usual move at this point is 7. ... d5. The Knight’s move leads to a transposition of moves”.
In Sydor – Cosulich, 3rd International Tournament, Bari 1972, a draw was agreed after 7. ... d6 8. d4 cxd4 9. cxd4 Qb6 10. Nc3 a6 11. Bf1 Rd8 ½–½. However, 12. Na4 followed by d4-d5 would seem to give White a crushing bind.
8. d4 cxd4 9. cxd4 Nc7 10. Bf1 d5 11. e5 Ne6 12. Nc3 f6. “Consideration should be given to 12. ... a6 in order to keep the Bishop away from b5 and to maintain pressure on d4 and e5”.
13. exf6 exf6. If, instead, 13. ... Bxf6 then 14. Be3 Qd6 15. Rc1 Kh8 16. g3 Bd7 17. Bg2 Rad8 18. Qd2 Bc8 19. b3 Qb4 20. Rcd1 Bg7 21. Qd3 Nc5 22. Qd2 Ne4? (22. ... Ne6) 23. Nxe4 dxe4 24. Ng5 Qxd2 25. Rxd2 Nxd4 (25. ... Bxd4 26. Bxd4+ Nxd4 27. Rxe4⩲) 26. Red1 e5 27. Nxe4 b6 28. Kh1 Bb7 29. Ng5 Bxg2+ 30. Kxg2 Rde8 31. Bxd4 exd4 32. Nf3 Rd8? (32. ... Re4 33. Nxd4? Bxd4 34. Rxd4 Re2=) 33. Nxd4 Bxd4 34. Rxd4 Rxd4 35. Rxd4 Rf7 36. f4 Rc7 37. Kf3 Kg7 38. Ke4 Kf6 39. Rc4 Rd7 40. g4 h6 41. h4 Rd6 42. Rc7 1–0 Ribli – Radojević, 4th Ivan Parčetić Memorial, Sombor 1970.
14. Bb5! Apparently stronger than 14. b3 f5 15. Ba3 Re8 16. Rc1 Bd7 17. Nxd5 Nexd4 18. Rxe8+ Bxe8 19. Nxd4 Bxd4 20. Rxc6 Bxc6 21. Qxd4 Bxd5 22. Bb2 Kf7 23. Bc4 Bxc4 24. Qxc4+ Kf8 25. Qc3 Qd1+ 26. Kh2 Qd6+ 27. g3 Rd8 28. Qg7+ Ke8 29. Bf6 Rd7 30. Qg8+ Qf8 31. Qe6+ Re7 ½–½ Ciocâltea – Ghitescu, International Tournament, Bucharest 1966.
14. ... f5 15. Bxc6 bxc6 16. Na4. “White’s plan is clearly outlined: to occupy the dark squares and, if possible, reduce material until remaining with only a White Knight against Black’s light-squared Bishop”.
16. ... f4 17. b3 Qd6 18. Bb2 Rf5
19. Nc5! “Another step forward to a winning endgame. The Pawn sacrifice is only temporary”.
19. ... Nxc5 20. dxc5 Qf8. “After 20. ... Qxc5 21. Rc1 the White pieces quickly enter the fray”.
As a matter of fact, after 20. ... Qxc5 21. Bxg7 Kxg7 22. Rc1 Qd6 23. Nd4 White’s position is imposing.
21. Bxg7 Kxg7. “Or 21. ... Qxg7 22. Re8+ Rf8 23. Qe1”.
22. Qd4+ Kg8 23. Re2 Bd7 24. Rae1 Re8 25. b4 Rxe2 26. Rxe2 Be8 27. h4 h6 28. Re5 Qf7 29. a4 a6 30. Qb2! “Threatens Qb2-e2 with attack on the e-file. Black is therefore compelled to exchange Rooks on e5”.
30. ... Bd7 31. Qe2 Rxe5 32. Qxe5 Qf5. “This costs a Pawn. But even without this mistake, the game could not have been saved”.
33. Qxf5 Bxf5 34. Ne5 Bc2 35. Nxc6 Bxa4
19. ... Nxc5 20. dxc5 Qf8. “After 20. ... Qxc5 21. Rc1 the White pieces quickly enter the fray”.
As a matter of fact, after 20. ... Qxc5 21. Bxg7 Kxg7 22. Rc1 Qd6 23. Nd4 White’s position is imposing.
21. Bxg7 Kxg7. “Or 21. ... Qxg7 22. Re8+ Rf8 23. Qe1”.
22. Qd4+ Kg8 23. Re2 Bd7 24. Rae1 Re8 25. b4 Rxe2 26. Rxe2 Be8 27. h4 h6 28. Re5 Qf7 29. a4 a6 30. Qb2! “Threatens Qb2-e2 with attack on the e-file. Black is therefore compelled to exchange Rooks on e5”.
30. ... Bd7 31. Qe2 Rxe5 32. Qxe5 Qf5. “This costs a Pawn. But even without this mistake, the game could not have been saved”.
33. Qxf5 Bxf5 34. Ne5 Bc2 35. Nxc6 Bxa4
36. Ne7+? This mistake went unnoticed by the commentator of Thurgauer Zeitung. The winning move was 36. Ne5! Bc2 37. c6 Bf5 38. c7+− with the dual threat of Ne5xg6 and Ne5-c6-a7(e7+).
36. ... Kf7 37. Nxd5 g5 38. hxg5 hxg5 39. Nc7. “Is this Knight going astray?”.
Oh, no. It is already gone.
39. ... Ke7
36. ... Kf7 37. Nxd5 g5 38. hxg5 hxg5 39. Nc7. “Is this Knight going astray?”.
Oh, no. It is already gone.
39. ... Ke7
40. Nxa6! Kd7? A dramatic faux pas. Cosulich overlooks 40. ... Kd8! (instead of 40. ... Kd7?); there might follow 41. b5 (otherwise the Knight is trapped) 41. ... Bxb5 42. Nb4 Ke7 (or any other move with the King) leaving White with a meaningless extra Pawn and a draw in sight.
41. c6+! Kxc6. “The Knight is free, for 41. ... Bxc6 42. Nb8+ and Nb8xc6 yields White an easily winning Pawn endgame”.
If 41. ... Kc8 then 42. Nc5 Bxc6 43. Ne6 winning easily.
42. Nc5 1–0. If 42. ... Bb5 then 43. Ne6 and it is over for Black.
41. c6+! Kxc6. “The Knight is free, for 41. ... Bxc6 42. Nb8+ and Nb8xc6 yields White an easily winning Pawn endgame”.
If 41. ... Kc8 then 42. Nc5 Bxc6 43. Ne6 winning easily.
42. Nc5 1–0. If 42. ... Bb5 then 43. Ne6 and it is over for Black.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



















































